Be less aggressive in maintaining focus on search box #4395
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
_templates/searchbox.html (1)
160-165: LGTM! Consider adding error logging.The implementation is clean and uses
requestAnimationFrameappropriately for smooth focus handling.Consider adding console warning when input field is not found:
function search_focus() { const input_field = document.getElementById("pfmod-input-0"); if (input_field) { requestAnimationFrame(() => input_field.focus()); + } else { + console.warn("Search input field not found"); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- _templates/searchbox.html (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
_templates/searchbox.html (1)
Pattern
**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
🔇 Additional comments (1)
_templates/searchbox.html (1)
172-173: LGTM! Good UX improvement.Maintaining focus on the search box after result selection is a good UX decision, allowing users to quickly perform another search if needed.
| // focus the search field on page load. | ||
| search_focus(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results from previous scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Consider implementing keyboard shortcut for search focus
While focusing the search field on page load can be helpful, it might interfere with normal keyboard navigation and accessibility. Instead:
- Add a keyboard shortcut (e.g., "/" key) to focus the search field
- Keep the existing focus call after clicking search results
- Remove the automatic focus on page load
This approach follows common documentation site patterns and provides better keyboard navigation experience while maintaining the quick-search functionality for users who need it.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider a less aggressive focus approach.
While focusing the search field on page load can be helpful, it might interfere with normal keyboard navigation and accessibility. Consider focusing only when:
- User presses "/" key (common pattern in documentation sites)
- User clicks near the search box
- User explicitly activates search via a button
Let's check if there are any accessibility guidelines in the project:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for accessibility-related documentation or guidelines
rg -i "accessibility|a11y" README.md docs/
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any existing keyboard shortcuts or search-related functionality
rg -i "search.*focus|keyboard|shortcut|keydown|keypress" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 17825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any existing keyboard shortcut handlers in the search functionality
rg -i "keydown|keypress.*search|/.*key" _templates/searchbox.html -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 77
Description:
Related issue (if applicable): fixes
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.