Skip to content

Conversation

potuz
Copy link
Contributor

@potuz potuz commented Oct 10, 2025

This PR adds two changes

  1. When processing a bid for zero value, do not add a builder pending payment.
  2. When processing attestations, only add to the payment quorum if the payment is not trivial

This PR adds two changes

1. When processing a bid for zero value, do not add a builder pending
   payment.
2. When processing attestations, only add to the payment quorum if the
   payment is not trivial
),
)
state.builder_pending_payments[SLOTS_PER_EPOCH + bid.slot % SLOTS_PER_EPOCH] = pending_payment
# Record the pending payment if there is some payment
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In addition we may want to enforce that the bid has some standard value for the fee_recipient for example, but I do not see why, other than bid equivocation.

@jtraglia jtraglia added the eip7732 ePBS label Oct 10, 2025
@jtraglia jtraglia changed the title eip7732: Deal with zero value bids correctly eip7732: deal with zero value bids correctly Oct 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jtraglia jtraglia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. Good catch @potuz.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants