Add support for document index tables #34
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you, this is a great update! 🙏 |
ines
added
enhancement
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docling
TableItemslabels are a union:label: Literal[DOCUMENT_INDEX, TABLE] = TABLEsee: https://ds4sd.github.io/docling/reference/docling_document/#docling_core.types.doc.TableItem.label
changes here ensure that tables classified with the label
DocItemLabel.DOCUMENT_INDEXare properly populated in extension attributesI added a test document but not sure how necessary. Struggled to create a dummy index pdf that was simple yet still got classified as a
document_indextable so took an excerpt of a real pdf. For that reason I did not do assertions on data frame contents to avoid brittleness.