Skip to content

docs: Deprecate TapDetector in favour of TapCallbacks #2886

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

luanpotter
Copy link
Member

Description

Deprecate TapDetector in favour of TapCallbacks

Checklist

  • I have followed the Contributor Guide when preparing my PR.
  • I have updated/added tests for ALL new/updated/fixed functionality.
  • I have updated/added relevant documentation in docs and added dartdoc comments with ///.
  • I have updated/added relevant examples in examples or docs.

Breaking Change?

  • Yes, this PR is a breaking change.
  • No, this PR is not a breaking change.

@luanpotter luanpotter marked this pull request as draft December 1, 2023 04:41
spydon added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
Update t-rex game to use `TapCallbacks` instead of `TapDetector`, in
anticipation of [deprecating the
latter](#2886).

Also update the term high score to avoid a dictionary entry.

Co-authored-by: Lukas Klingsbo <[email protected]>
@spydon
Copy link
Member

spydon commented Dec 17, 2024

@luanpotter what were our concerns here again? I think it would be great to only have TapCallbacks.

@luanpotter
Copy link
Member Author

@spydon see my design doc for complete breakdown

@spydon
Copy link
Member

spydon commented Apr 2, 2025

@spydon see my design doc for complete breakdown

Where is the design doc? Would be good to have that linked here so that we can have a look at it every 6 months after we've forgotten what it's about. 😄

@luanpotter
Copy link
Member Author

Flame: Event System

@luanpotter
Copy link
Member Author

@spydon should I reactivate this now that we have agreed on moving forward with this?

@spydon
Copy link
Member

spydon commented Apr 22, 2025

@spydon should I reactivate this now that we have agreed on moving forward with this?

Did you get a green light from @erickzanardo too? Because I think he was the one that was sceptical. Otherwise it sounds good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants