Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Feature/add dlopen config flag #1

Closed

Conversation

florianschmidt1994
Copy link
Owner

This PR is just to "show around", not be be merged. Will open an upstream PR for that.

Copy link

@GitMensch GitMensch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not opening a PR to the OCamlPro mirror? That's still not upstream but provides a wider reach.

Please add a Changelog entry to libcob (your change) and config (mine).

@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ typedef struct __cob_settings {
unsigned int cob_core_on_error; /* signal handling and possible raise of SIGABRT
/ creation of coredumps on runtime errors */
char *cob_core_filename; /* filename for coredump creation */

int cob_load_global; /* Wether dlopen should use the global or local namespace */

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's a setting from call.c, so move up before name_convert and as it is a plain boolean change its type to unsigned int

libcob/call.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libcob/call.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libcob/call.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@GitMensch
Copy link

This seems to be superseded by OCamlPro#209 - please apply the review-requested-changes (as it is the same branch the other will be updated as well), then close this one.

@florianschmidt1994
Copy link
Owner Author

Addressed the comments @GitMensch. Now closing this in favor of OCamlPro#209

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants