Revise and improve cached factory handling with params

[ArtAhmetajCR]

This Pr references issue #382 where an assertion on the getObject method (and its async equivalent) blocks cached factories from having parameters passed.
The fix is adjusting the assertion to include the "cachedFactory" as a type.
While fixing this issue I also noticed that the lastParameters were not being saved in the cached factory section, which resulted in the cached factory functions being broken since this check always failed:

if (weakReferenceInstance?.target != null &&
              param1 == lastParam1 &&
              param2 == lastParam2)

Saving the lastParams when creating new instances fixes this.

Appropriate tests have been writen for the cached factory which were entirely missing earlier.

[samirsimnica]

LGTM!

[escamoteur]

@samirsimnica just curious, why could you approve this PR?

[escamoteur]

I think you don't use the dispose in your test so the linter complains and the CI can't run.

[ArtAhmetajCR]

I have removed the method given that its not used on the test class atm, added it for consistency since it was on other classes but I dont use dispose counter to assert anything atm, if you want I can add it with your guidance.