add a simple openai agent example #7
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
|
@kumare3 here’s a simple agent example with just tool calls, and it uses the openai agent sdk. this is an extension to your pb & j example. :) |
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Samhita Alla <[email protected]>
| return await spread_peanut_butter(bread, peanut_butter) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @function_tool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why do we have to do this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mean create a shadow function, what do we need to do to make it seamless?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cosmicBboy and i were talking about this. flyte.trace would work seamlessly here, but a task wouldn’t, mainly because both the task and the OpenAI tool decorators materialize the function into a dataclass, so stacking them in either order breaks things.
so we can propose two approaches: one using a task and the other using a trace. ultimately, it’ll be up to the user to choose, depending on whether the tool needs to run in a separate runtime. i know this puts the decision on the user, but i think it’s the most flexible option, unless we want to enforce the use of traces only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should consider creating light-weight utility functions in the flyte.ai namespace that serve as drop-in replacements for popular frameworks, e.g.
from flyte.ai.openai.agents import function_tool
@function_tool
@env.task
def my_tool(...): ...There was a problem hiding this comment.
should this be a follow up?
3 participants
No description provided.