Handle missing windows home directory #1461
Conversation
twiggler
commented
Dec 17, 2025
twiggler
commented
- Fix spliting home when there is no home
- Turn cache reader and writer into an iterator
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1461 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.74% 80.27% -0.48%
==========================================
Files 390 392 +2
Lines 34217 34434 +217
==========================================
+ Hits 27629 27641 +12
- Misses 6588 6793 +205
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
twiggler
changed the title
Miauwkeru
left a comment
Miauwkeru
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It feels like the cache change should be in its own PR for the eventual git history to make more sense. As I wouldn't expect that a commit called "Handle missing windows home directory" would change the caching mechanism that hits all the plugins.
.vscode/launch.json
Outdated
| @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "version": "0.2.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think this needed to be added
| assert users[1].home == windows_path("C:\\Users\\John") | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_windows_user_registry_parsing(target_win_users: Target) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test doesn't fail if you use the previous code.
I was able to recreate the erroneous behaviour that it displays on a vm. Here i created a fake SID but it did not contain a ProfileImagePath RegistryValue. Causeing it to error and it would try to call target.resolve on home which is a None object. Shouldn't that be the behaviour this tests? / shouldn't we have a test for that specifically?
