test: fix tests for github action #1037
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for unit testing. It activates previously commented sections, ensuring a structured workflow for unit tests. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (3)
419-422: LGTM! Consider adding one more assertionThe expanded test for the closeModel method now properly checks the reset behavior of the form and the closing of the dialog. This is a good improvement in test coverage.
Consider adding one more assertion to check that the
customFieldControlis reset to null:expect(component.customFieldControl).toBeNull();This would ensure that the method completely clears the reference to the previously selected custom field control.
415-417: LGTM! Consider adding a check for initial dialog stateThe expanded test for the closeModel method now provides comprehensive coverage of the method's behavior. It checks the resetting of the customFieldForm, customFieldControl, and the closing of the dialog.
To make the test even more robust, consider adding an assertion at the beginning of the test to verify the initial state of the dialog:
expect(component.showDialog).toBeTrue();This would ensure that the test is starting from the correct initial state before calling the closeModel method.
Also applies to: 419-422
Line range hint
1-465: Consider these suggestions for further improvementThe test file is well-structured and provides good coverage of the component's functionality. To further enhance the quality and maintainability of the tests, consider the following suggestions:
Consistency in test descriptions: Ensure all test descriptions follow a consistent format, preferably starting with a verb (e.g., "should handle...", "should update...", etc.).
Error case testing: Add more tests for error scenarios, especially for methods that interact with services (e.g., save method error handling).
Edge case coverage: Include tests for edge cases, such as handling of empty or invalid input in form controls.
Mocking consistency: Ensure all external dependencies (services, router, etc.) are consistently mocked across all test suites.
Test isolation: Review the tests to ensure each test is truly isolated and doesn't depend on the state set by previous tests.
These improvements will further increase the robustness and reliability of your test suite.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-c1-import-settings/intacct-c1-import-settings.component.spec.ts (2)
415-417: Enhance test description for closeModel methodThe test description has been improved to better reflect the actual behavior being tested. It now explicitly mentions resetting the form and the source field.
Line range hint
1-465: Excellent improvements to test coverage and qualityThe changes made to this test file significantly enhance both the coverage and the quality of the tests for the IntacctC1ImportSettingsComponent. Notable improvements include:
- More comprehensive testing of the closeModel method.
- New tests for saveDependentCustomField and saveFyleExpenseField methods.
- Expanded tests for various utility functions.
- Improved test descriptions that better reflect the behavior being tested.
These changes will help ensure the reliability and correctness of the component's functionality.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-import-settings/intacct-import-settings.component.spec.ts (2)
16-16: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe addition of
blankMappingto the import statement is appropriate and doesn't interfere with existing imports.
488-498: LGTM: Improved test coverage for closeModelThe modifications to the
closeModeltest case are well-implemented:
- The updated description accurately reflects the additional behavior being tested.
- The new assertion verifies that the
source_fieldis reset to null, enhancing the test coverage.These changes ensure that the
closeModelfunction is thoroughly tested, including its effect on thesource_field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1)
1-5: Yo, listen up! This workflow's got a name that's straight fire!The "Unit Test" name's droppin' truth, no need to perspire.
Pull request triggers are set, they're tight and they're wired,
But yo, them commas on line 5 got too much space, it's not desired.Here's a quick fix to make it clean, no lie:
- types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened] + types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened]🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml (3)
28-35: Yo, this coverage game is strong, it's off the hook!We're droppin' comments, uploadin' to Codecov, that's the look.
It's all set up right, no need to cook,
This part's tight, it's straight from the book.Keep this flow goin', it's the real deal,
Helpin' us catch bugs before they make us squeal.
19-27:⚠️ Potential issueYo, we're runnin' tests, but them env vars ain't no joke!
The test command's solid, it's gonna make our code provoke,
But them environment variables? They're just a smoke and mirrors cloak.
We're exposin' "lolo" and fake URLs, that ain't no way to roll,
Gotta keep our secrets safe, that's how we reach our goal.Check it, let's run this script to see if we're usin' secrets right:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for proper use of secrets in the workflow # Test: Look for hardcoded values that should be secrets rg '(FYLE_CLIENT_ID|CALLBACK_URI|API_URL|FYLE_APP_URL|SI_API_URL|SAGE300_API_URL):.+' .github/workflows/unit-test.yml # Test: Check for proper use of secrets rg '\$\{\{ *secrets\..+ *\}\}' .github/workflows/unit-test.ymlIf we ain't using secrets, we gotta fix this, you feel me? Replace them hardcoded values with secret references, like:
env: FYLE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.FYLE_CLIENT_ID }} CALLBACK_URI: ${{ secrets.CALLBACK_URI }} # ... and so on for the rest🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
12-18:⚠️ Potential issueYo, we're settin' up Node, but we gotta make some tweaks!
We're rockin' Node 22.2.0, that's fresh off the press,
But it might be too new, could cause some stress.
And check it, our setup action's old school, not fly,
We gotta upgrade that joint, make it reach for the sky.Here's the fix, straight from the underground:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v1 + - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - uses: actions/setup-node@v1 + uses: actions/setup-node@v3 with: - node-version: 22.2.0 + node-version: 18Yo, let's run this script to check if our deps are cool with Node 18:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check package.json for Node version compatibility # Test: Look for engine requirements in package.json rg '"engines"' package.json -A 5🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
14-14: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/core/services/common/clone-setting.service.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-7: Hold up, we got a skipped test suite here, that ain't flyYo, this test suite's been silenced like it's got stage fright
We gotta let it spit its rhymes, know what I'm sayin'?
Remove that 'x' from 'xdescribe' and let these tests run wild
'Cause if we ain't testin', we might as well be guessin'Here's how we gonna fix this, straight up:
-xdescribe('CloneSettingService', () => { +describe('CloneSettingService', () => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/interceptor/jwt.interceptor.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/bamboo-hr/bamboo-hr.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/common/api.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/common/auth.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/common/clone-setting.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/org/org.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/core/services/travelperk/travelperk.service.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml (2)
1-5: Yo, this workflow's name is tight, and the trigger's alright!Listen up, homies! The name "Unit Test" is straight fire,
And them pull request triggers? They light my desire.
It's all good in the hood, no need to perspire,
This setup's so smooth, it takes us higher!🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
28-35: Yo, this coverage game is tight, it's outta sight!Listen up, crew, 'cause this part's slick,
Reportin' coverage with every git commit!
fylein's action and Codecov too,
Keepin' our tests honest and true!This setup's fire, it's got that spark,
Illuminatin' our code like it's outta the dark!
So keep it rollin', don't change a thing,
'Cause with this coverage, our tests gonna sing!src/app/core/services/common/auth.service.spec.ts (1)
14-14: Yo, check it, we switched up the API base URL!Listen up, we just flipped the script on that API_BASE_URL,
Now it's rollin' with environment.cluster_domain_api_url, that's the truth.
Make sure this change is what you meant to do,
'Cause if it ain't, your tests might just come unglued.Let's run this script to make sure we're all in tune:
If these checks pass, we're golden. If not, we might need to revisit this change, you feel me?
✅ Verification successful
API Base URL Change is Solid!
Yo, you switched up the API_BASE_URL, kept it tight,
Checked all the specs, everything's looking right.
No traces of the old URL left in the scene,
Your tests are clean, your setup's mean.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we're checkin' if this URL change is consistent, you feel me? # First, let's see if other specs are using this new URL rg -g '*.spec.ts' 'environment\.cluster_domain_api_url' # Now, let's make sure we ain't got no leftovers of the old URL rg -g '*.spec.ts' 'environment\.api_url' # Finally, let's peek at that environment file to see what's really goin' down cat $(fd -g '*environment.ts' | head -n 1)Length of output: 1033
src/app/core/services/common/api.service.spec.ts (1)
18-18: Yo, check it, we switched up the API base URL!Listen up, homie, we just flipped the script on that API_BASE_URL,
From api_url to cluster_domain_api_url, that's the new move.
Make sure this change is what you meant to do,
'Cause if it ain't, your tests might just come unglued.Let's run this script to see if we're all in tune:
✅ Verification successful
API URL update is on point!
Checked the scene, no old
api_urlin sight.
Everything's rolling withcluster_domain_api_url, all tight.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we're checkin' if all the homies are using the same API URL # First, let's see who's still rollin' with the old school api_url echo "Crews still using the old api_url:" rg "environment\.api_url" --type ts # Now, who's with the new flow, using cluster_domain_api_url echo "\nSquads updated to cluster_domain_api_url:" rg "environment\.cluster_domain_api_url" --type ts # Any configs still repping the old URL? echo "\nConfig files maybe still using old URL:" rg "api_url" --type jsonLength of output: 1307
package.json (1)
10-10: Yo, listen up! We got a change in the mix, let's break it down!Aight, so you added this "setup:branding" to the CI test script, huh?
It's like droppin' a new beat before the main track, I feel ya!
But here's the real talk - we gotta make sure this ain't gonna mess with our test flow, you know what I'm sayin'?Before we call it a wrap, let's run this script and see if it changes our test game:
If this script shows any differences, we might need to take a closer look, you feel me?
Make sure this change is what you really want, 'cause we don't want no surprises in our CI, that's for real!src/app/core/services/bamboo-hr/bamboo-hr.service.spec.ts (1)
14-14: Yo, listen up! We're switchin' up the API game!Aight, check it out, we're flippin' the script on that API_BASE_URL,
Swappin' out that old 'api_url' for the fresh 'cluster_domain_api_url', it's true.
This change is gonna hit all them HTTP requests in the mix,
So make sure your tests don't trip, and everything still clicks.Let's run this script to make sure we ain't missin' nothin':
If this script spits out any lines, we gotta update those too, you feel me?
✅ Verification successful
Yo, that search came up dry, no traces to spy. Let’s amplify the scope and give it another try.
Yo, that 'jsx' type was trippin', we shut it down quick.
Droppin' it from the script, now we're back on the stick.
Here’s the new flow, keep it clean and tight,
Run this script and make sure everything's right.
Yo, 'tsx' tried to crash the party, now we back on track,
Droppin' 'tsx' from the mix, ain't no time to slack.
Keepin' it smooth with 'ts' and 'js' in the flow,
Run this script again, let’s see if anything show.
Yo, we scanned every line, nothing old in the mix,
'api_url' ain't lurking, your changes got the fix.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we're checkin' if any other files still usin' that old 'api_url' rg "environment\.api_url" --type tsLength of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Second pass to find all 'environment.api_url' usages across the codebase rg "environment\.api_url" --type ts --type js --type jsx --type tsx --no-ignore --hiddenLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Second pass to find all 'environment.api_url' usages across the codebase without 'jsx' rg "environment\.api_url" --type ts --type js --type tsx --no-ignore --hiddenLength of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Third pass to find all 'environment.api_url' usages across the codebase without 'tsx' rg "environment\.api_url" --type ts --type js --no-ignore --hiddenLength of output: 68
src/app/core/services/travelperk/travelperk.service.spec.ts (1)
14-14: Yo, listen up! This change is straight fire!Aight, so we switched up the API_BASE_URL, now it's hittin' that cluster_domain_api_url instead of the old api_url. It's like we upgraded our mic, ya feel me?
Let's make sure this change is consistent across the board, run this script to check it out:
If this script drops more lines than Eminem's "Rap God", we know we're on the right track!
✅ Verification successful
Change Locked In!
All spec files vibing with the new
cluster_domain_api_url. API_BASE_URL is solid across the board. We're good to go!🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the API_BASE_URL change across all spec files # Test: Search for API_BASE_URL in spec files rg -g '*.spec.ts' 'API_BASE_URL.*cluster_domain_api_url'Length of output: 842
src/app/core/services/org/org.service.spec.ts (2)
16-16: Yo, listen up! We got a change in the API base, it's time to embrace!Aight, check it out, we switched up the game,
Fromapi_urltocluster_domain_api_url, ain't that insane?
Make sure this change don't mess with our flow,
'Cause if it does, our tests gonna blow!Run this script, let's see what we find,
If any other spots need to be realigned:✅ Verification successful
<!-- [monologue] [task verify_change_1/1] Review the impact of changing `API_BASE_URL` from `environment.api_url` to `environment.cluster_domain_api_url`. [observations] - The shell script searching for `environment.api_url` returned no matches. - This indicates that `environment.api_url` is no longer used in the codebase. [analysis] Since the old `environment.api_url` doesn't appear elsewhere, the change should be safe and not affect other parts of the application. [actions] - Conclude that the change is verified. - No further scripts are necessary. --> **Yo, change is clear, no traces to fear!** API_BASE_URL got the new name in the game, No old references left, everything stays the same. Tests remain tight, our flow's still right, No issues found, we're cruising through the night!🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we searchin' for that old API_BASE_URL, you feel me? rg "environment\.api_url" --type tsLength of output: 37
16-16: Yo, this change is like a domino effect, it's gonna hit every test!Listen up, homie, this ain't no small feat,
Every HTTP request's gonna feel the heat.
Make sure this new URL's the real deal,
Or our tests might start to squeal.Check the environment config, make it clear,
That this new URL's supposed to be here:src/app/core/interceptor/jwt.interceptor.spec.ts (1)
20-20: Yo, listen up! We've got a change in the API base URL!Aight, check it out:
We switched up the game, changed the track
Fromapi_urltocluster_domain_api_url, that's a fact
Make sure this new beat drops right
Across all your tests, keep it tightRun this script, let's see what we find
If this change is consistent, we'll be aligned:✅ Verification successful
API base URL update verified!
All spec files aligned, no lingering
api_urlfound.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we're searching for API_BASE_URL in spec files # Looking for any inconsistencies, that's what riles echo "Searching for API_BASE_URL in spec files:" rg "API_BASE_URL.*environment" --type ts -g "*spec.ts" echo "\nChecking for any remaining uses of api_url:" rg "api_url" --type ts -g "*spec.ts"Length of output: 4397
| - name: Install dependencies | ||
| run: npm install | ||
| - name: Test | ||
| run: npm run unit_test:ci | ||
| env: | ||
| FYLE_CLIENT_ID: "lolo" | ||
| CALLBACK_URI: "http://lolo.fyle.tech/callback" | ||
| CLUSTER_DOMAIN_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| FYLE_APP_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| SI_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| SAGE300_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| - name: Unit Test Coverage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, these env vars are whack, they need a new track!
Listen up, homies, I'm droppin' knowledge,
These env vars? They ain't from college!
"lolo" and "http://lolo.fyle.tech"? That's a joke,
In production, that setup would make us choke!
So here's the deal, let's make it clear,
Replace them placeholders, make 'em disappear!
Use real values, or better yet,
Pull from secrets, that's a safer bet!
Example:
env:
FYLE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.FYLE_CLIENT_ID }}
CALLBACK_URI: ${{ secrets.CALLBACK_URI }}
# ... and so on for other variablesKeep it secure, that's how we roll,
'Cause in this game, security's the goal!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| unit-test: | ||
| permissions: write-all | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, these permissions are whack, let's dial 'em back!
Listen up, dawg, I'm spittin' facts,
"write-all" perms? That's too lax!
For unit tests, we don't need that stack,
Let's lock it down, keep our security intact!
Here's the fix, so take note:
jobs:
unit-test:
- permissions: write-all
+ permissions: read-all
runs-on: ubuntu-latestWe're keepin' it tight, no slack,
'Cause in this game, there's no turnin' back!
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| jobs: | |
| unit-test: | |
| permissions: write-all | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| steps: | |
| jobs: | |
| unit-test: | |
| permissions: read-all | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| steps: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/setup_branding_config.js (2)
6-19: This code's got flow, it's straight fire!Yo, check it, this conditional's tight
Switchin' up the config based on the environment, alright?
But listen up, I got a small tweak in mind
To make this code even more refinedHow 'bout we use object property value shorthand?
It'll make the code cleaner, help us understand
Here's how it could look, tell me what you think:const configObject = { - brandName: process.env.BRAND_NAME ? process.env.BRAND_NAME : '{{BRAND_NAME}}', + brandName: process.env.BRAND_NAME || '{{BRAND_NAME}}', // Apply this change to all other properties };This change keeps the logic tight
Makes the code cleaner, a beautiful sight
What do you say, wanna make it right?
Line range hint
1-30: Yo, this script's got mad skills, it's killin' it!The changes you made, they're straight fire
Handlin' different envs, takin' it higher
But let's talk about that error handlin', my friend
We could make it even better in the endHere's a thought to make it more robust
Add some error logging, give it a boost:fs.writeFile(targetPath, config, 'utf8', (err) => { if (err) { - return console.error(err); + console.error('Error writing config file:', err); + process.exit(1); } + console.log('Config file written successfully'); });This way, we log the error with more detail
And exit the process if things derail
Plus, we confirm when it's all good
What do you think? Should we add this to the hood?.github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1)
3-5: Yo, listen up, I'm about to drop some knowledge on this workflow trigger!This change is dope, it's got the right flow,
Runnin' tests on PRs, that's the way to go!
But hold up, I spotted somethin' wack,
Extra spaces after commas, we gotta pull that back!Here's how we fix it, so pay attention:
on: pull_request: - types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened] + types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened]Clean it up, make it tight,
'Cause in this code game, we gotta do it right!🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1 hunks)
- karma.conf.js (1 hunks)
- scripts/setup_branding_config.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/unit-test.yml
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[warning] 5-5: too many spaces after comma
(commas)
[error] 29-29: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
scripts/setup_branding_config.js (1)
3-5: Yo, this change is dope, no joke!Switchin' from
consttoletforconfig, that's smart
Allows us to reassign, givin' the code a fresh start.github/workflows/unit-test.yml (1)
35-42: Yo, this coverage game is tight, it's outta sight!Listen up, 'cause this is how we do it right,
Reportin' coverage, shinin' bright!
Custom action for the GitHub flow,
Codecov upload to let everyone know!This is how we keep our code clean,
Quality's high, bugs stay unseen!
So keep it up, don't you stop,
'Cause in this test game, we're on top!karma.conf.js (1)
35-35:⚠️ Potential issueYo, listen up! We just dropped the coverage beat, homie!
Aight, so we just axed them coverage thresholds like they was wack MCs. But hold up, we gotta keep our code tight, you feel me?
Lemme spit some truth:
- We used to demand 50% coverage across the board, now we ain't checkin' at all.
- This could lead to some weak bars slippin' through, ya dig?
Run this script to see if we still got coverage game elsewhere:
If we ain't got no other coverage checks, we better bring 'em back or our code gonna be softer than a pop chorus!
✅ Verification successful
Yo, check it out—coverage's still slammin' in the CI tight, so we all good. No slackin' on that code grind.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, we searchin' for coverage checks, homie! rg -i 'coverage|threshold' package.json .github/workflows/*.ymlLength of output: 1077
| env: | ||
| GH_UNIT_TEST_ENV: true | ||
| BRAND_NAME: "Fyle" | ||
| WEBPAGE_TITLE: "Fyle Integrations Settings" | ||
| BRAND_ID: "fyle" | ||
| SUPPORT_EMAIL: "staging-1-in" | ||
| HELP_ARTICLE_DOMAIN: "[email protected]" | ||
| ENV_ID: "https://help.manageexpenses.capitalone-fylehq.com" | ||
| FYLE_CLIENT_ID: "lolo" | ||
| CALLBACK_URI: "http://lolo.fyle.tech/callback" | ||
| CLUSTER_DOMAIN_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| FYLE_APP_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| SI_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" | ||
| SAGE300_API_URL: "http://lolo.fyle.tech" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, these env vars are whack, they need a new track!
Listen up, homies, I'm droppin' knowledge,
These env vars? They ain't from college!
"lolo" and "http://lolo.fyle.tech"? That's a joke,
In production, that setup would make us choke!
So here's the deal, let's make it clear,
Replace them placeholders, make 'em disappear!
Use real values, or better yet,
Pull from secrets, that's a safer bet!
Example:
env:
FYLE_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.FYLE_CLIENT_ID }}
CALLBACK_URI: ${{ secrets.CALLBACK_URI }}
# ... and so on for other variablesKeep it secure, that's how we roll,
'Cause in this game, security's the goal!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 29-29: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| unit-test: | ||
| permissions: write-all | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, these permissions are too high, we gotta bring 'em down low!
Listen up, I'm spittin' truth, no lies,
'write-all' perms? That's askin' for surprise!
For unit tests, we don't need that much power,
Let's lock it down, make our security tower!
Here's the fix, so take note:
jobs:
unit-test:
- permissions: write-all
+ permissions: read-all
runs-on: ubuntu-latestWe're keepin' it tight, no slack,
'Cause in this security game, there's no turnin' back!
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| jobs: | |
| unit-test: | |
| permissions: write-all | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| jobs: | |
| unit-test: | |
| permissions: read-all | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest |
| - name: Setup GitHub Action | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v1 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: 22.2.0 | ||
| - name: Install dependencies |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, these actions are old school, we need a new rule!
Listen up, I'm about to school ya,
These action versions? They ain't foolin' ya!
We gotta upgrade, keep our flow smooth,
So peep this diff, it's our next move:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v1
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Setup GitHub Action
- uses: actions/setup-node@v1
+ uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
- node-version: 22.2.0
+ node-version: 18We're rollin' with LTS, that's how we flex,
Node 18's stable, it's what's next!
Update them actions, keep 'em fresh,
'Cause in this code game, we're the best!
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - uses: actions/checkout@v1 | |
| - name: Setup GitHub Action | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v1 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: 22.2.0 | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | |
| - name: Setup GitHub Action | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: 18 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
14-14: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
|
JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
changed the title
JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
added
the
staging_deploy
JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
temporarily deployed
to
Staging
GitHub Actions
Inactive
2 participants
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86bz
Summary by CodeRabbit
AuthServiceand others to ensure correct API interactions.QbdMappingTableComponenttest suite.