Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: employee setting handling for employee field mapping #1137

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

anishfyle
Copy link
Contributor

@anishfyle anishfyle commented Jan 6, 2025

Description

  • fixed employee field mapping handling if null

Clickup

Screen.Recording.2025-01-06.at.10.05.19.AM.mov

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved payload construction for employee settings by adding default values for employee field mapping and auto-mapping options when no value is specified.
    • Ensured robust handling of employee field mapping in QuickBooks Online configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes focus on the QBOEmployeeSettingModel class in the QuickBooks Online (QBO) employee configuration model. The constructPayload method has been updated to enhance payload construction by introducing default values for the employee_field_mapping and auto_map_employees properties. These defaults ensure that valid values are assigned when the corresponding form control values are undefined or null, thereby improving the reliability of the payload generation.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts Modified constructPayload method to include default fallback values for employee_field_mapping and auto_map_employees properties.

Poem

🐰 In the realm of QuickBooks' embrace,
A rabbit's code finds its rightful place,
Payload robust, no value astray,
Default mapping saves the day!
Hop, hop, configuration's delight! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c206785 and 40abc76.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: unit-test

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Extra Small PR label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts (1)

48-48: Use of || fallback is effective but consider ?? operator

Using || ensures a fallback is set even if the control value is falsy (e.g., an empty string). If the intention is only to fallback when the control is null or undefined, switching to the nullish coalescing operator (??) might be more precise. For example:

- employee_field_mapping: employeeSettingsForm.get('employeeMapping')?.value || EmployeeFieldMapping.EMPLOYEE,
+ employee_field_mapping: employeeSettingsForm.get('employeeMapping')?.value ?? EmployeeFieldMapping.EMPLOYEE,

This prevents empty strings or other falsy values from unintentionally defaulting to EmployeeFieldMapping.EMPLOYEE.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 977e96c and 301a3c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app/core/models/qbo/qbo-configuration/qbo-employee-setting.model.ts (1)

45-45: Good addition of a dedicated method to construct the payload

This static method centralizes and clarifies payload construction logic, making the codebase more maintainable. It logically groups the necessary form values and transforms them into the shape required by the backend.

@anishfyle anishfyle requested a review from ashwin1111 January 6, 2025 04:41
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Unit Test Coverage % values
Statements 33.24% ( 4122 / 12398 )
Branches 26.6% ( 1179 / 4432 )
Functions 25.78% ( 894 / 3467 )
Lines 33.42% ( 4056 / 12133 )

@anishfyle anishfyle merged commit aefcef5 into master Jan 6, 2025
4 checks passed
anishfyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
* fix: employee setting handling for employee field mapping

* name

* vendor and null
anishfyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
* fix: employee setting handling for employee field mapping

* name

* vendor and null
anishfyle added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
* fix: employee setting handling for employee field mapping

* name

* vendor and null
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS Extra Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants