feat: only show top level when multiple location entity #1162
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/shared/components/si/core/intacct-location-entity/intacct-location-entity.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
89-106: Consider extracting 'top_level' as a constant.The string literal 'top_level' is used in multiple places. Consider extracting it to a constant to improve maintainability.
+ private readonly TOP_LEVEL_ID = 'top_level'; + private readonly TOP_LEVEL_NAME = 'Top Level'; + private getLocationEntityMappingPayload(locationEntityId: any): LocationEntityPost { - if (locationEntityId.destination_id !== 'top_level') { + if (locationEntityId.destination_id !== this.TOP_LEVEL_ID) { const locationEntity = this.locationEntityOptions.filter(entity => entity.destination_id === locationEntityId.destination_id); return { location_entity_name: locationEntity[0].value, destination_id: locationEntity[0].destination_id, country_name: locationEntity[0].detail?.country ? locationEntity[0].detail.country : null, workspace: this.workspaceId }; } return { - location_entity_name: 'Top Level', - destination_id: 'top_level', + location_entity_name: this.TOP_LEVEL_NAME, + destination_id: this.TOP_LEVEL_ID, country_name: null, workspace: this.workspaceId };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/shared/components/si/core/intacct-location-entity/intacct-location-entity.component.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/shared/components/si/core/intacct-location-entity/intacct-location-entity.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
171-186: Verify edge case: Previously selected top-level option with single location.Please ensure that the form initialization in
setupLocationEntityMappingcorrectly handles the case where:
- A user previously selected the 'top_level' option
- The number of location entities is reduced to one
- The 'top_level' option is no longer available
Run this script to check for existing mappings with 'top_level':
✅ Verification successful
Edge case is properly handled in the current implementation
The code already handles the scenario correctly through these mechanisms:
- The 'top_level' option is only included when multiple location entities exist
- The form initialization preserves any existing mapping
- Error cases are properly handled with required validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any persistence or database schema files that might store # the 'top_level' mapping to understand the potential impact rg -l "top_level" --type ts --glob "**/*.model.ts" --glob "**/*.schema.ts"Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for top_level in the component and get setupLocationEntityMapping implementation rg "top_level|setupLocationEntityMapping" -A 10 src/app/shared/components/si/core/intacct-location-entity/intacct-location-entity.component.ts # Also check for any other components or services that might handle location entity selection ast-grep --pattern 'setupLocationEntityMapping($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 2011
158-163: LGTM! The implementation aligns with PR objectives.The conditional logic correctly implements the requirement to only show the top-level option when multiple location entities exist.
Let's verify the impact on the
getLocationEntityMappingPayloadmethod which handles 'top_level' as a special case:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The conditional top-level option is safe to implement
The codebase analysis confirms that the conditional addition of the top-level option won't affect any dependent functionality:
- The
getLocationEntityMappingPayloadmethod in the same component handles top-level as a special case and remains valid- Other usages of 'top_level' in the codebase are either in test fixtures or unrelated contexts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any other references to 'top_level' in the codebase # that might be affected by this change rg -l "top_level" --type tsLength of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the actual usage context of 'top_level' in the identified files for file in $(rg -l "top_level" --type ts); do echo "=== $file ===" rg -C 3 "top_level" "$file" echo -e "\n" doneLength of output: 4772
* feat: only show top level when multiple location entity * lint fix
Description
Clickup
Summary by CodeRabbit