Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: QBO complete export log #994

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

test: QBO complete export log #994

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

anishfyle
Copy link
Contributor

@anishfyle anishfyle commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

Unit tests for QBO complete export log
Screenshot 2024-10-02 at 10 32 39 AM

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwcuq33

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Enhanced the test suite for the QboCompleteExportLogComponent, ensuring comprehensive coverage of functionalities.
    • Introduced new tests for component behavior, including handling actions, date range changes, and API response parsing.
  • Chores

    • Added mock data for expense groups to improve testing scenarios, including detailed attributes for expense management.
    • Introduced pagination parameters to enhance testing capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to the test suite for the QboCompleteExportLogComponent, making previously inactive tests active and significantly expanding the test coverage. New imports and mock data structures have been added to improve testing capabilities. The qbo.fixture.ts file now includes a mock response for expense groups, facilitating more comprehensive testing scenarios. Overall, the modifications aim to ensure better validation of the component's functionalities and interactions with various services.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts Updated the test suite to activate tests, added new imports, expanded setup with service spies, enhanced initialization tests, and introduced new tests for component actions and form handling.
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.fixture.ts Added a new constant mockExpenseGroupResponse for expense group data and imported ExpenseGroupResponse. Introduced mockPageSize for pagination parameters.

Possibly related PRs

  • test: Export Settings QBO #931: The changes in the QboExportSettingsComponent test suite involve enhancing the testing structure and coverage, similar to the modifications made in the QboCompleteExportLogComponent tests, which also focus on improving test robustness and service interactions.
  • test: QBO Dashboard #984: The QboDashboardComponent test suite enhancements include improved testing for component behavior and service interactions, paralleling the updates made to the QboCompleteExportLogComponent tests that enhance testing capabilities and service method validations.
  • test: intacct dashboard #981: The IntacctDashboardComponent test suite improvements include the addition of service spies and comprehensive testing scenarios, which aligns with the enhancements made in the QboCompleteExportLogComponent tests that also focus on service interactions and component behavior.
  • test: intacct export settings init, save, and misc functions #1001: The modifications to the IntacctExportSettingsComponent test suite include restructuring and enhancing test coverage, similar to the changes made in the QboCompleteExportLogComponent tests that aim to improve the overall testing framework and service interactions.

Suggested reviewers

  • DhaaraniCIT
  • ashwin1111

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where tests now bloom,
The QboCompleteExportLog finds room.
With mocks and spies, the code takes flight,
Ensuring each feature shines so bright!
Let's hop with joy, for coverage is grand,
In the world of testing, we take a stand! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/L Large PR label Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (5)

Line range hint 56-74: Good coverage of component initialization!

The test cases for component creation, default value initialization, and initial service call are well-structured and cover important aspects of the component's setup.

Consider adding a test case to verify that the exportLogForm is properly initialized with the expected form controls. This would ensure that the form structure remains consistent as the component evolves.


84-92: Good test coverage for handleSimpleSearch!

The use of fakeAsync and tick is appropriate for testing the debounced search functionality. The test effectively verifies that the search query is updated, the offset is reset, and the service method is called with the correct parameters.

Consider adding an assertion to check that the exportLogService.getExpenseGroups is called with the correct parameters, including the new search query. This would ensure that the search functionality is correctly implemented.


113-136: Well-structured tests for form setup and date handling!

The test cases effectively verify:

  1. The correct setup of the exportLogForm with all necessary controls.
  2. Proper handling of date range changes, including updating the selectedDateFilter and isDateSelected properties.
  3. Correct behavior when clearing the date range (setting to null).

The use of fakeAsync and tick is appropriate for handling the asynchronous nature of these operations.

Consider adding a test case to verify that the exportLogForm controls are properly initialized with the expected default values. This would ensure that the form's initial state is correct and consistent.


138-165: Excellent test coverage for API response parsing!

This test case provides comprehensive coverage of the expense group API response parsing. It effectively verifies:

  1. Correct parsing of the total count and number of expense groups.
  2. Accurate mapping of expense details within each expense group.
  3. Proper parsing of response logs.
  4. Correct date parsing for created_at, exported_at, and updated_at fields.

This level of detail ensures that the component correctly interprets and stores the data received from the API.

Consider adding a test case for error handling when parsing the API response. This could include scenarios such as missing fields or unexpected data types, ensuring that the component gracefully handles potential API inconsistencies.


Line range hint 1-166: Excellent overall test coverage for QboCompleteExportLogComponent!

This test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the QboCompleteExportLogComponent's functionality. The tests effectively cover:

  1. Component initialization and default values
  2. User interactions (search, pagination, opening expenses in Fyle)
  3. Form handling and date range selection
  4. API response parsing and data mapping

The use of spy objects for service dependencies and asynchronous testing techniques (fakeAsync, tick) is appropriate and well-implemented.

To further enhance the test suite, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add tests for error handling scenarios, such as API failures or unexpected data formats.
  2. Include tests for any complex logic or calculations within the component that may not be directly tied to user interactions or API responses.
  3. Consider adding integration tests that verify the component's interaction with its parent component or any child components, if applicable.

These additions would provide even more robust coverage and help ensure the component's reliability across various scenarios.

src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.fixture.ts (1)

1770-2154: LGTM: Comprehensive mock data for ExpenseGroupResponse.

The mockExpenseGroupResponse constant provides a detailed and realistic mock for expense group responses. It covers various scenarios and includes nested structures, which is excellent for thorough testing.

To improve readability, consider breaking down this large constant into smaller, more manageable pieces. For example, you could create separate constants for individual expense groups and then combine them in the main mockExpenseGroupResponse.

Here's a suggestion to improve readability:

const mockExpenseGroup1 = {
  id: 13501,
  expenses: [/* ... */],
  // ... other properties
};

const mockExpenseGroup2 = {
  id: 13500,
  expenses: [/* ... */],
  // ... other properties
};

// ... more individual expense groups

export const mockExpenseGroupResponse: ExpenseGroupResponse = {
  count: 3,
  next: "http://quickbooks-api.staging-integrations:8000/api/workspaces/454/fyle/expense_groups/?limit=50&offset=50&tasklog__status=COMPLETE",
  previous: null,
  results: [
    mockExpenseGroup1,
    mockExpenseGroup2,
    // ... other expense groups
  ]
};

This approach would make the code more modular and easier to maintain.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1493a07 and f39398f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.fixture.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (3)

1-50: Excellent improvements to the test setup!

The changes made to the import statements and test suite setup are well-structured and comprehensive. The addition of fakeAsync, tick, FormBuilder, and ReactiveFormsModule indicates that the tests now cover asynchronous behavior and form interactions. The creation of spy objects for various services allows for better control and verification of service interactions.

The activation of the test suite (changing from xdescribe to describe) is a positive step, indicating that these tests are now ready to be executed as part of the test run.


76-82: Well-structured test for openExpenseinFyle!

This test case effectively verifies that the openExpenseinFyle method correctly interacts with the WindowService to open the expense in a new tab. The use of a mock expense ID and the AccountingExportModel.getFyleExpenseUrl method ensures that the correct URL is generated and passed to the service.


94-111: Comprehensive tests for pagination functionality!

The test cases for pageSizeChanges and pageChanges are well-structured and cover the essential aspects of pagination handling. They effectively verify:

  1. The loading state is set correctly.
  2. Relevant properties (currentPage, limit, offset) are updated appropriately.
  3. The PaginatorService is called to store the new page size when necessary.
  4. The ExportLogService is called to fetch the updated data.

These tests ensure that the pagination functionality works as expected and maintains the correct state.

src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.fixture.ts (1)

13-13: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.

The import of ExpenseGroupResponse is appropriate for the new mock data being added to this file.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (5)

Line range hint 56-68: LGTM: Good coverage of component initialization

The initial test cases are well-structured:

  • The basic 'should create' test ensures the component can be instantiated.
  • The new test for default values is a great addition, verifying that the component initializes with the expected state.

These tests provide good coverage of the component's initial state.

Consider adding assertions for any other important initial properties or states of the component that aren't currently covered in the 'should initialize with correct default values' test.


78-86: LGTM: Comprehensive test for simple search functionality

This test case effectively verifies the simple search behavior:

  • Proper use of fakeAsync and tick to handle the debounce delay.
  • Checks for correct updates to searchQuery, offset, and currentPage.
  • Verifies that the exportLogService.getExpenseGroups method is called.

Consider adding an assertion to check the parameters passed to exportLogService.getExpenseGroups to ensure the search query is correctly included in the service call.


107-130: LGTM: Good coverage of form setup and date range handling

The test cases for form setup and date range handling are well-structured:

  • 'should setup form correctly' verifies the presence of all expected form controls.
  • Date range handling tests cover both setting a date range and handling null values.
  • Proper use of fakeAsync and tick for handling asynchronous behavior.

These tests provide good coverage of the form's structure and date-related functionality.

In the date range tests, consider adding assertions to verify that the exportLogForm.get('end') control is also updated correctly when setting or clearing the date range.


132-159: LGTM: Comprehensive test for API response parsing

This test case provides excellent coverage of the expense group API response parsing:

  • Verifies correct total count and length of parsed arrays.
  • Checks detailed expense information, including expense numbers, amounts, currencies, categories, and IDs.
  • Validates correct parsing of response logs and date fields.

The thoroughness of this test ensures that the component correctly processes and stores the API response data.

Consider adding a check for the fund_source property of the expenses, if it's a relevant field in your application. This would ensure complete coverage of all important expense properties.


Line range hint 1-160: Great job on improving the test coverage!

This updated test suite for the QboCompleteExportLogComponent is comprehensive and well-structured. Key strengths include:

  1. Thorough setup with appropriate spy objects and imports.
  2. Good coverage of component initialization and default values.
  3. Effective tests for user interactions like opening expenses and searching.
  4. Comprehensive tests for pagination functionality.
  5. Detailed verification of form setup and date range handling.
  6. In-depth testing of API response parsing.

The use of fakeAsync and tick for handling asynchronous operations is particularly commendable. The tests provide a solid foundation for ensuring the reliability and correctness of the component's functionality.

To further enhance the test suite, consider:

  1. Adding edge case scenarios, such as testing with empty API responses or error conditions.
  2. Implementing snapshot testing for complex UI elements, if applicable.
  3. Exploring the use of test data factories to make the tests more maintainable and reduce duplication of mock data setup.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f39398f and b10e91c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo-main/qbo-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log/qbo-complete-export-log.component.spec.ts (3)

1-50: LGTM: Improved test setup and imports

The changes to the import statements and test suite setup are well-structured and follow best practices:

  • Addition of fakeAsync and tick for asynchronous testing.
  • Inclusion of FormBuilder and ReactiveFormsModule for form testing.
  • Creation of spy objects for various services, allowing better control over service interactions in tests.

These improvements enhance the testing capabilities and provide a solid foundation for the test suite.


70-76: LGTM: Well-structured test for opening expense in Fyle

This test case effectively verifies the 'openExpenseinFyle' functionality:

  • It uses a mock expense ID to test the method.
  • The windowService spy is used to check if the correct URL is opened.
  • The test ensures that the AccountingExportModel.getFyleExpenseUrl method is called with the right parameter.

This approach provides good coverage for this user interaction.


88-105: LGTM: Thorough coverage of pagination functionality

The pagination-related test cases are well-structured and comprehensive:

  • 'should handle page size changes' verifies updates to isLoading, currentPage, limit, and checks for correct service method calls.
  • 'should handle page changes' checks for updates to isLoading, offset, currentPage, and verifies the service method call.

These tests provide good coverage of the pagination behavior, ensuring that the component correctly handles both page size and page number changes.

@anishfyle anishfyle requested a review from DhaaraniCIT October 3, 2024 07:23
@anishfyle anishfyle requested a review from ashwin1111 October 3, 2024 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/L Large PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants