fix: fix for integrations on admin dashboard when multiple admins are present #996
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for deploying to the C1 staging environment, triggered by pushes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
1 similar comment
|
PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/c1_staging_deployment.yml (2)
10-14: LGTM: Job conditions and environment are well-defined.The job configuration is appropriate for a staging deployment:
- The conditional execution ensures the job runs only for intended events.
- The use of ubuntu-latest is standard and appropriate.
- The QA environment is correctly specified for staging deployment.
Consider breaking the long condition into multiple lines for improved readability:
if: | (github.event_name != 'pull_request') || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'c1_staging_deploy')
1-54: Overall assessment: The workflow is well-structured but needs some improvements.This GitHub Actions workflow for deploying to C1 Staging is generally well-structured and achieves its purpose. However, there are several areas where it can be improved:
- Update the versions of GitHub Actions (e.g., checkout action) to the latest stable versions.
- Improve the Kustomize installation process for better security and reproducibility.
- Address the issue with the
$NEW_TAGvariable in the final step.- Add error handling to git operations.
- Consider breaking long conditions into multiple lines for readability.
Once these improvements are implemented, the workflow will be more robust, secure, and maintainable.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
16-16: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
31-31: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
40-40: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:158: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite.component.ts (1)
84-85: Ensure consistent naming conventions for query parametersThere is an inconsistency in the naming of query parameters:
login_requireduses snake_case, whileauthCodeuses camelCase. For better readability and maintainability, it's advisable to use a consistent naming convention for all query parameters throughout the application.Consider renaming
authCodetoauth_codeto matchlogin_required, or vice versa, depending on the project's naming conventions:const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; - const authCode = params.authCode; + const authCode = params.auth_code;Ensure that the corresponding query parameter names used elsewhere in the application and backend are updated accordingly.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (1)
101-101: Simplify Conditional Check Using Optional ChainingConsider using the optional chaining operator
?.to simplify the conditional check when accessingAppcues.Apply this diff:
if (event instanceof NavigationEnd) { - (window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page(); + (window as any).Appcues?.page(); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 101-101: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/app/integrations/xero/xero.component.ts (1)
94-94: Improve robustness ofloginRequiredparameter parsingThe comparison
params.login_required === 'true'assumes thatlogin_requiredis always a string with the exact value'true'. To make the code more robust and handle different cases (e.g., different letter cases or missing parameters), consider using a case-insensitive comparison and safely accessing the parameter.Apply this diff to enhance the comparison:
- const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; + const loginRequired = params.login_required?.toLowerCase() === 'true';
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/c1_staging_deployment.yml (1 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/netsuite/netsuite.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/xero/xero.component.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/c1_staging_deployment.yml
16-16: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
31-31: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
40-40: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:158: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 Biome
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts
[error] 101-101: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
.github/workflows/c1_staging_deployment.yml (2)
1-9: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger events are well-defined.The workflow name "Deploy to C1 Staging" is clear and descriptive. The trigger events (push to master and pull requests with the "c1_staging_deploy" label) are appropriate for a staging deployment workflow.
16-23:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate checkout action and clarify Sentry auth token usage.
- The
actions/checkout@v2is outdated. Consider updating to the latest version:- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- The
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKENis defined but not used in the Docker push step. If it's not needed, consider removing it to keep the workflow clean.To verify if the Sentry auth token is used in the Docker build process, please run the following command:
If the token is not used, consider removing it from this step.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
16-16: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
src/app/integrations/qbo/qbo.component.ts (4)
2-2: Correctly importedActivatedRoutefrom@angular/routerThe addition of
ActivatedRouteto the import statement is appropriate for accessing route parameters.
12-12: ImportedQboAuthServicefor authentication handlingIncluding
QboAuthServiceis necessary for managing authentication logic within the component.
33-34: AddedrouteandqboAuthServiceto the constructorInjecting
ActivatedRouteandQboAuthServicethrough the constructor is correct for dependency injection of these services.
99-99: UpdatedngOnInitto invokehandleAuthParametersCalling
handleAuthParametersinngOnInitappropriately integrates authentication handling into the component's initialization process.src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (5)
2-2: AddedActivatedRouteImportThe import of
ActivatedRoutefrom@angular/routeris necessary for accessing route parameters.
12-12: AddedSiAuthServiceImportImporting
SiAuthServiceis appropriate for handling authentication logic in the component.
33-33: InjectedActivatedRouteinto ConstructorAdding
ActivatedRouteto the constructor allows the component to access query parameters from the route.
38-38: InjectedSiAuthServiceinto ConstructorIncluding
SiAuthServicein the constructor enables authentication actions likeloginWithAuthCode.
104-104: Updated Initialization LogicReplacing
this.getOrCreateWorkspace();withthis.handleAuthParameters();inngOnInit()ensures that authentication parameters are processed before workspace setup.
| - name: Install kustomize | ||
| run: | | ||
| curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/master/hack/install_kustomize.sh" | bash | ||
| sudo mv kustomize /usr/local/bin/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve Kustomize installation method.
The current installation method for Kustomize, while common, is not the most secure or reproducible. Consider using a more controlled installation method:
- Use a specific version of Kustomize instead of the latest.
- Verify the downloaded binary's checksum.
Here's an improved installation step:
- name: Install kustomize
run: |
KUSTOMIZE_VERSION=v4.5.7 # Specify the desired version
curl -sLO "https://github.com/kubernetes-sitter/kustomize/releases/download/kustomize%2F${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz"
curl -sL "https://github.com/kubernetes-sitter/kustomize/releases/download/kustomize%2F${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_checksums.txt" | grep linux_amd64.tar.gz | sha256sum -c
tar xzf kustomize_${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz
sudo mv kustomize /usr/local/bin/
rm kustomize_${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gzThis approach ensures a specific version is used and verifies the integrity of the downloaded binary.
| - name: Clone another repository | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 | ||
| with: | ||
| repository: ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }} | ||
| ref: master | ||
| path: ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }} | ||
| persist-credentials: false | ||
| token: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_GIT_ACCESS_TOKEN }} | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Update Image Tag | ||
| run: | | ||
| NEW_TAG="v$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" | ||
| cd ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}/${{ vars.C1_STAGING_DEPLOY_DIR }}/staging/integrations | ||
| kustomize edit set image docker.io/${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}/fyle_integrations-app=docker.io/${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}/fyle_integrations-app:$NEW_TAG |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update checkout action for cloning repository.
The actions/checkout@v2 used for cloning the repository is outdated. Update it to the latest version:
- name: Clone another repository
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
repository: ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}
ref: master
path: ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}
persist-credentials: false
token: ${{ secrets.DEPLOY_GIT_ACCESS_TOKEN }}The rest of the steps for cloning the repository and updating the image tag look good. The use of variables and secrets for sensitive information is a good practice.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
31-31: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
40-40: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:158: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
| - name: Commit and push changes | ||
| run: | | ||
| cd ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}/ | ||
| git config --global user.email "[email protected]" | ||
| git config --global user.name "GitHub Actions" | ||
| git add . | ||
| git commit -m "Deployed integrations-app-qa:$NEW_TAG to staging" | ||
| git remote set-url origin https://x-access-token:${{ secrets.DEPLOY_GIT_ACCESS_TOKEN }}@github.com/${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }} | ||
| git pull origin master | ||
| git push origin master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address $NEW_TAG variable and consider adding error handling.
- The
$NEW_TAGvariable is used in the commit message but it's not defined in this step. Define it at the beginning of this step:
- name: Commit and push changes
run: |
NEW_TAG="v$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)"
cd ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}/
# ... rest of the step- Consider adding error handling to the git operations. For example:
- name: Commit and push changes
run: |
NEW_TAG="v$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)"
cd ${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}/
git config --global user.email "[email protected]"
git config --global user.name "GitHub Actions"
git add .
git diff --staged --quiet || git commit -m "Deployed integrations-app-qa:$NEW_TAG to staging"
git remote set-url origin https://x-access-token:${{ secrets.DEPLOY_GIT_ACCESS_TOKEN }}@github.com/${{ vars.STAGING_DEPLOY_REPO }}
git pull origin master --ff-only
git push origin master || (git pull --rebase origin master && git push origin master)
shell: bashThis change adds a check before committing (in case there are no changes) and handles potential push conflicts.
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle errors in loginWithAuthCode subscription
The current implementation of this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe() lacks error handling. If the login process fails, the user will not receive feedback, and the application might remain in a loading state. It's important to handle errors to enhance user experience and ensure the application can recover gracefully.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe(
() => this.setupWorkspace(),
+ (error) => {
+ console.error('Login failed:', error);
+ this.isLoading = false;
+ // Optionally, display an error message to the user or navigate away
+ }
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace(), | |
| (error) => { | |
| console.error('Login failed:', error); | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| // Optionally, display an error message to the user or navigate away | |
| } | |
| ); |
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | ||
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | ||
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | ||
| const authCode = params.authCode; | ||
|
|
||
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | ||
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.setupWorkspace(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent potential memory leaks by unsubscribing from Observables
The subscription to this.route.queryParams in the handleAuthParameters method may lead to a memory leak if not properly managed. Since the queryParams observable can emit multiple times, it's important to complete the subscription when it's no longer needed. Consider using the take(1) operator to automatically unsubscribe after the first emission.
Apply this diff to modify the subscription:
+import { take } from 'rxjs/operators';
private handleAuthParameters(): void {
- this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => {
+ this.route.queryParams.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(params => {
const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true';
const authCode = params.authCode;
if (loginRequired && authCode) {
this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe(
() => this.setupWorkspace()
);
} else {
this.setupWorkspace();
}
});
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | |
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | |
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | |
| const authCode = params.authCode; | |
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | |
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| } else { | |
| this.setupWorkspace(); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| import { take } from 'rxjs/operators'; | |
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | |
| this.route.queryParams.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(params => { | |
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | |
| const authCode = params.authCode; | |
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | |
| this.nsAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| } else { | |
| this.setupWorkspace(); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| } |
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | ||
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | ||
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | ||
| const authCode = params.authCode; | ||
|
|
||
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | ||
| this.qboAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.setupWorkspace(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling in loginWithAuthCode subscription
In the handleAuthParameters method, consider adding error handling to the subscribe call of loginWithAuthCode. Currently, if the authentication fails, the error is not handled, which may lead to unexpected behavior.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
if (loginRequired && authCode) {
this.qboAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe(
() => this.setupWorkspace(),
+ (error) => {
+ // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., display an error message or redirect
+ console.error('Authentication error:', error);
+ // Optionally, navigate to an error page or display a notification to the user
+ }
);
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | ||
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | ||
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | ||
| const authCode = params.authCode; | ||
|
|
||
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | ||
| this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.getOrCreateWorkspace() | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.getOrCreateWorkspace(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Memory Leak Due to Unmanaged Subscription
The subscription to this.route.queryParams may result in a memory leak if not properly managed, as queryParams is an observable that can emit multiple times. Consider using the take(1) operator to automatically complete the subscription after the first emission.
Apply this diff to use take(1):
private handleAuthParameters(): void {
- this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => {
+ this.route.queryParams.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(params => {
const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true';
const authCode = params.authCode;
if (loginRequired && authCode) {
this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe(
() => this.getOrCreateWorkspace()
);
} else {
this.getOrCreateWorkspace();
}
});
}Also, add the import statement for take:
import { take } from 'rxjs/operators';| this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.getOrCreateWorkspace() | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling to Authentication Subscription
The subscription to loginWithAuthCode does not handle errors, which could lead to unhandled exceptions if authentication fails. Consider adding an error handler to manage authentication failures gracefully.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe(
() => this.getOrCreateWorkspace(),
+ (error) => {
+ // Handle authentication error
+ console.error('Authentication failed:', error);
+ // Optionally, inform the user or navigate to an error page
+ }
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.getOrCreateWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| this.siAuthService.loginWithAuthCode(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.getOrCreateWorkspace(), | |
| (error) => { | |
| // Handle authentication error | |
| console.error('Authentication failed:', error); | |
| // Optionally, inform the user or navigate to an error page | |
| } | |
| ); |
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for xeroAuthService.login subscription
The subscription to this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode) lacks error handling. If the login attempt fails, the user may not be informed, and setupWorkspace may not be called, potentially leaving the app in a loading state. Consider adding error handling to manage failed login attempts gracefully.
Apply this diff to handle errors in the login subscription:
- this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe(
- () => this.setupWorkspace()
- );
+ this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe({
+ next: () => this.setupWorkspace(),
+ error: error => {
+ // Handle login error
+ console.error('Login error:', error);
+ this.isLoading = false;
+ }
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe({ | |
| next: () => this.setupWorkspace(), | |
| error: error => { | |
| // Handle login error | |
| console.error('Login error:', error); | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| } | |
| }); |
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | ||
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | ||
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | ||
| const authCode = params.authCode; | ||
|
|
||
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | ||
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe( | ||
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.setupWorkspace(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and complete subscriptions to prevent potential memory leaks
The handleAuthParameters method subscribes to queryParams but does not handle errors or unsubscribe from the observable. This can lead to memory leaks if the component remains active for an extended period or if errors occur. Consider adding error handling and using the take(1) operator to automatically complete the subscription after the first emission.
Apply this diff to improve the subscription:
+import { take } from 'rxjs/operators';
private handleAuthParameters(): void {
- this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => {
+ this.route.queryParams.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(params => {
const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true';
const authCode = params.authCode;
if (loginRequired && authCode) {
- this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe(
- () => this.setupWorkspace()
- );
+ this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe({
+ next: () => this.setupWorkspace(),
+ error: error => {
+ // Handle login error
+ console.error('Login error:', error);
+ this.isLoading = false;
+ }
+ });
} else {
this.setupWorkspace();
}
- });
+ }, error => {
+ // Handle queryParams error
+ console.error('QueryParams error:', error);
+ this.setupWorkspace();
+ this.isLoading = false;
+ });
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | |
| this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { | |
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | |
| const authCode = params.authCode; | |
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | |
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe( | |
| () => this.setupWorkspace() | |
| ); | |
| } else { | |
| this.setupWorkspace(); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| import { take } from 'rxjs/operators'; | |
| private handleAuthParameters(): void { | |
| this.route.queryParams.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(params => { | |
| const loginRequired = params.login_required === 'true'; | |
| const authCode = params.authCode; | |
| if (loginRequired && authCode) { | |
| this.xeroAuthService.login(authCode).subscribe({ | |
| next: () => this.setupWorkspace(), | |
| error: error => { | |
| // Handle login error | |
| console.error('Login error:', error); | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| this.setupWorkspace(); | |
| } | |
| }, error => { | |
| // Handle queryParams error | |
| console.error('QueryParams error:', error); | |
| this.setupWorkspace(); | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| } |
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (3)
50-52: LGTM! Consider adding type safety for thecodeparameter.The changes to the
redirectmethod look good. Including thecodeas a query parameter in the redirect URL is consistent with the modifications in other methods and likely contributes to fixing the integration issues for multiple admins.For improved type safety, consider explicitly typing the
codeparameter:private redirect(redirectUri: string | undefined, code: string): void { if (redirectUri) { this.router.navigate([redirectUri + `?code=${code}`]); } else { this.router.navigate(['/integrations']); } }
109-111: LGTM! Consider simplifying the conditional logic.The changes to the
saveUserProfileAndNavigatemethod look good. Passing thecodethrough the entire authentication flow is consistent with the modifications in other methods and likely contributes to fixing the integration issues for multiple admins.For improved readability, consider simplifying the conditional logic:
this.redirect(redirectUri, code);This change removes the duplicate
redirectcall, as it's the same for both conditions.
Line range hint
116-120: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for missing code.The changes to the
loginmethod look good. Extracting thecodefrom query parameters and passing it tosaveUserProfileAndNavigateis consistent with the modifications in other methods and likely contributes to fixing the integration issues for multiple admins.Consider adding error handling for cases where the
codeis missing:private login(): void { this.route.queryParams.subscribe(params => { if (params.code) { this.saveUserProfileAndNavigate(params.code, params.redirect_uri); } else { console.error('Login failed: Missing authentication code'); // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., show an error message to the user } }); }This addition will help catch and handle cases where the authentication code is missing, improving the robustness of the login process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (4 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/xero/xero.component.ts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/app/integrations/xero/xero.component.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts
[error] 100-100: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall, the changes look good and address the PR objectives.The modifications to the
LoginComponentconsistently handle thecodeparameter throughout the authentication flow, which likely addresses the issue of integrations on the admin dashboard when multiple admins are present. The changes are well-implemented and maintain the overall structure of the component.Key improvements:
- The
redirectmethod now includes thecodeas a query parameter.- The
saveUserProfileAndNavigatemethod passes thecodethrough the entire authentication process.- The
loginmethod extracts thecodefrom query parameters and initiates the authentication flow.These changes ensure that the unique
codefor each admin is preserved and used throughout the login process, which should resolve the integration issues mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure that these changes don't introduce any unintended side effects, please verify:
- The login process works correctly for both single and multiple admin scenarios.
- The integrations on the admin dashboard function as expected after these changes.
- There are no regressions in other parts of the application that might rely on the previous login flow.
This script will help identify any places where the
codeparameter might not be consistently used in the authentication flow across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
✅ Verification Successful
The
codeparameter is consistently used throughout the authentication flow in theLoginComponentand related services. All relevant methods correctly handle and preserve thecode, ensuring reliable authentication behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the `code` parameter is consistently used across the codebase echo "Checking for inconsistent usage of 'code' parameter in authentication flow:" rg --type typescript -e "saveUserProfileAndNavigate\([^)]*\)" -e "redirect\([^)]*\)" -e "login\([^)]*\)" src/Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Re-verify that the `code` parameter is consistently used across the codebase echo "Rechecking for inconsistent usage of 'code' parameter in authentication flow with corrected file type:" rg --type ts -e "saveUserProfileAndNavigate\([^)]*\)" -e "redirect\([^)]*\)" -e "login\([^)]*\)" src/Length of output: 1919
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (2)
84-94: Potential Memory Leak Due to Unmanaged SubscriptionAs previously noted, subscribing to
this.route.queryParamswithout unsubscribing or completing the subscription may lead to a memory leak. Consider using thetake(1)operator to automatically complete the subscription after the first emission.
88-90: Add Error Handling to Authentication SubscriptionAs mentioned earlier, the subscription to
loginWithAuthCodedoes not handle errors, which could lead to unhandled exceptions if authentication fails. Consider adding an error handler to manage authentication failures gracefully.
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ngOnInit(): void { | ||
| this.router.events.subscribe((event) => { | ||
| if (event instanceof NavigationEnd) { | ||
| (window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify Code Using Optional Chaining
The expression (window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page(); can be simplified using optional chaining for better readability.
Apply this diff to use optional chaining:
- (window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page();
+ (window as any).Appcues?.page();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| (window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page(); | |
| (window as any).Appcues?.page(); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 100-100: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (3)
50-54: Ensure proper handling of thecodeparameter in the redirect URI.The changes to the
redirectmethod look good. However, there are a few points to consider:
The
codeparameter is now being appended to the redirect URI. Make sure this is the intended behavior and that the receiving endpoint is prepared to handle this parameter.The console logging on line 54 should be removed before merging to production, as it may expose sensitive information.
Consider the following improvements:
Use
encodeURIComponent(code)when appending the code to the URL to ensure proper URL encoding:this.router.navigate([redirectUri + `?code=${encodeURIComponent(code)}`]);Remove the console.log statement or wrap it in a development-only check:
if (!environment.production) { console.log('redirectUri', redirectUri + `?code=${code}`); }
122-125: Remove debug logging and ensure proper error handling.The changes to the
loginmethod look good overall. However, there are a few points to consider:
The console logging statements on lines 123 and 125 should be removed before merging to production, as they may expose sensitive information.
It's good that you're checking for the presence of the
codeparameter, but consider adding error handling for cases where it might be missing.Consider the following improvements:
Remove the console.log statements or wrap them in a development-only check:
if (!environment.production) { console.log('code', params.code); console.log('redirect_uri', params.redirect_uri); }Add error handling for missing
code:if (params.code) { this.saveUserProfileAndNavigate(params.code, params.redirect_uri); } else { console.error('Login failed: No code provided'); // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., show an error message to the user }
Leftover
console.logStatements FoundThe following
console.logstatements remain inLoginComponent:
console.log('redirectUri', redirectUri + \?code=${code}`);`console.log('code', params.code);console.log('redirect_uri', params.redirect_uri);These should be removed or conditionally included to enhance the security and cleanliness of the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-138: Overall assessment: Changes look good with minor improvements suggested.The modifications to the
LoginComponentappear to address the issue mentioned in the PR objectives regarding integrations on the admin dashboard when multiple admins are present. The changes consistently propagate thecodeparameter through the login flow, which likely helps maintain proper authentication state.A few minor improvements have been suggested:
- Use
encodeURIComponentfor thecodeparameter in the redirect URI.- Remove or conditionally include debug logging statements.
- Add error handling for cases where the
codeparameter might be missing.These changes should enhance the robustness and security of the login process.
To ensure that these changes don't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:
This script will help ensure that the
codeparameter is used consistently, debug statements are removed, and proper error handling is in place.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `code` parameter is properly handled throughout the login flow. # Test 1: Check if the `code` parameter is used consistently echo "Test 1: Checking for consistent use of 'code' parameter" rg --type typescript -e 'code:' -e 'params\.code' src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts # Test 2: Verify that there are no leftover debug console.log statements echo "Test 2: Checking for leftover console.log statements" rg --type typescript 'console\.log' src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts # Test 3: Check for proper error handling when 'code' is missing echo "Test 3: Checking for error handling when 'code' is missing" rg --type typescript -e 'if \(params\.code\)' -e 'else' src/app/auth/login/login.component.tsLength of output: 737
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify that the `code` parameter is properly handled throughout the login flow with corrected TypeScript file type. # Test 1: Check if the `code` parameter is used consistently echo "Test 1: Checking for consistent use of 'code' parameter" rg --type ts -e 'code:' -e 'params\.code' src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts # Test 2: Verify that there are no leftover debug console.log statements echo "Test 2: Checking for leftover console.log statements" rg --type ts 'console\.log' src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts # Test 3: Check for proper error handling when 'code' is missing echo "Test 3: Checking for error handling when 'code' is missing" rg --type ts -e 'if \(params\.code\)' -e 'else' src/app/auth/login/login.component.tsLength of output: 1135
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (1)
87-87: Remove Debugging Statements from Production CodeThe
console.log(params);statement is a debugging statement that should be removed from production code to avoid unintended information disclosure and console clutter.Apply this diff to remove the
console.logstatement:- // eslint-disable-next-line - console.log(params);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts
[error] 101-101: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/auth/login/login.component.ts (1)
111-113: LGTM: Proper propagation of thecodeparameter.The changes to the
saveUserProfileAndNavigatemethod look good. Thecodeparameter is correctly added to the method signature and properly passed to theredirectmethod calls. This ensures consistency with the changes made to theredirectmethod.src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.component.ts (3)
84-95: Potential Memory Leak Due to Unmanaged SubscriptionThe previous comment regarding the potential memory leak due to the unmanaged subscription to
this.route.queryParamsremains valid. Please address this issue as previously suggested.
89-91: Add Error Handling to Authentication SubscriptionThe previous comment about adding error handling to the
loginWithAuthCodesubscription is still applicable. Please consider handling errors to prevent unhandled exceptions.
97-100: Simplify Code Using Optional ChainingThe previous comment about simplifying the code using optional chaining is still valid. Consider updating
(window as any).Appcues && (window as any).Appcues.page();to use optional chaining for better readability.
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
div360
added
c1_staging_deploy
Description
Please add PR description here, add screenshots if needed
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cvd6ahx
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
These updates streamline the deployment process and enhance user experience by ensuring secure and efficient access to workspaces.