fix: Delegatee switch back top header #3466
Conversation
sret-farhan2021
requested review from
Chethan-Fyle and
arjunaj5
as code owners
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@sret-farhan2021 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new interactive element in the delegated account message component. The HTML now features an underlined "Switch back" clickable text bound to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts
[error] 15-15: Expected blank line between class members.
(lines-between-class-members)
[error] 15-15: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 19-19: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
[error] 33-33: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
🪛 GitHub Check: Run linters
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts
[failure] 15-15:
Expected blank line between class members
[failure] 15-15:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[failure] 19-19:
Missing return type on function
[failure] 33-33:
Missing return type on function
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts
[error] 15-15: Expected blank line between class members
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts (2)
1-6: Mind-blowing imports, I tell you!These imports are like my perfectly choreographed action sequences - each one has its purpose and timing. The network and routing services are going to make this component a blockbuster!
26-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)This network watcher is like my entry scene - perfectly executed!
The implementation is solid, mind it! Just remember to add the return type, and it will be perfect like my style!
- setupNetworkWatcher(): void { + private setupNetworkWatcher(): void {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| constructor(private authService: AuthService, private router: Router, private networkService: NetworkService) {} | ||
|
|
||
| ngOnInit() { | ||
| from(this.authService.getEou()).subscribe((res) => { | ||
| this.delegateeName = res.us.full_name; | ||
| }); | ||
| this.setupNetworkWatcher(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
When I point out something, even return types listen!
Add return type to ngOnInit, like how I add punch to my dialogues!
- ngOnInit() {
+ ngOnInit(): void {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(private authService: AuthService, private router: Router, private networkService: NetworkService) {} | |
| ngOnInit() { | |
| from(this.authService.getEou()).subscribe((res) => { | |
| this.delegateeName = res.us.full_name; | |
| }); | |
| this.setupNetworkWatcher(); | |
| } | |
| constructor(private authService: AuthService, private router: Router, private networkService: NetworkService) {} | |
| ngOnInit(): void { | |
| from(this.authService.getEou()).subscribe((res) => { | |
| this.delegateeName = res.us.full_name; | |
| }); | |
| this.setupNetworkWatcher(); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 19-19: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
🪛 GitHub Check: Run linters
[failure] 19-19:
Missing return type on function
| delegateeName: string; | ||
| isConnected$: any; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Listen carefully! Type safety is like my signature sunglasses - you must wear it with style!
The isConnected$ needs proper typing, and we need a blank line between class members. Let me show you how it's done!
delegateeName: string;
- isConnected$: any;
+ isConnected$: Observable<boolean>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| delegateeName: string; | |
| isConnected$: any; | |
| delegateeName: string; | |
| isConnected$: Observable<boolean>; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 15-15: Expected blank line between class members.
(lines-between-class-members)
[error] 15-15: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
🪛 GitHub Check: Run linters
[failure] 15-15:
Expected blank line between class members
[failure] 15-15:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint
[error] 15-15: Expected blank line between class members
| switchBack() { | ||
| if (!this.isConnected$) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| this.router.navigate(['/', 'enterprise', 'delegated_accounts', { switchToOwn: true }]); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mind it! Your connectivity check needs my style of perfection!
The connectivity check is not subscribing to the Observable, making it as ineffective as a villain trying to defeat me!
- switchBack() {
- if (!this.isConnected$) {
- return;
- }
- this.router.navigate(['/', 'enterprise', 'delegated_accounts', { switchToOwn: true }]);
+ switchBack(): void {
+ this.isConnected$.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(isConnected => {
+ if (!isConnected) {
+ return;
+ }
+ this.router.navigate(['/', 'enterprise', 'delegated_accounts', { switchToOwn: true }]);
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| switchBack() { | |
| if (!this.isConnected$) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.router.navigate(['/', 'enterprise', 'delegated_accounts', { switchToOwn: true }]); | |
| } | |
| switchBack(): void { | |
| this.isConnected$.pipe(take(1)).subscribe(isConnected => { | |
| if (!isConnected) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this.router.navigate(['/', 'enterprise', 'delegated_accounts', { switchToOwn: true }]); | |
| }); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 33-33: Missing return type on function.
(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)
🪛 GitHub Check: Run linters
[failure] 33-33:
Missing return type on function
| <span class="delegated-acc"> | ||
| You're now managing {{ delegateeName | ellipsis : 15 }}'s account | ||
| <u (click)="switchBack()" [disabled]="!isConnected">Switch back</u> | ||
| </span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your HTML needs my superhero touch!
The disabled attribute on won't work like my punch dialogues! Let's style it properly!
- <u (click)="switchBack()" [disabled]="!isConnected">Switch back</u>
+ <span
+ class="switch-back-link"
+ (click)="isConnected ? switchBack() : null"
+ [class.disabled]="!isConnected"
+ >
+ <u>Switch back</u>
+ </span>Add this CSS to your stylesheet:
.switch-back-link {
cursor: pointer;
}
.switch-back-link.disabled {
opacity: 0.5;
cursor: not-allowed;
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.spec.ts(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (12.x)
| @@ -13,9 +14,10 @@ describe('DelegatedAccMessageComponent', () => { | |||
|
|
|||
| beforeEach(waitForAsync(() => { | |||
| const authServiceSpy = jasmine.createSpyObj('AuthService', ['getEou']); | |||
| authServiceSpy.getEou.and.returnValue(of(apiEouRes)); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
The transformation from Promise to Observable is stylish, but incomplete!
Like how I transform from a simple bus conductor to a superstar, you've transformed the auth service mock from Promise to Observable. But where are the test cases for the new switchBack feature? The RouterTestingModule is ready for action, but no one's called "Action!" yet!
Add these test cases to make your test suite as powerful as my punch dialogues:
it('should handle switch back when connected', () => {
component.isConnected$ = of(true);
component.switchBack();
// Add router navigation assertions
});
it('should not switch back when disconnected', () => {
component.isConnected$ = of(false);
component.switchBack();
// Verify no navigation occurs
});Also applies to: 20-20
| expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.delegated-acc').textContent).toContain( | ||
| `You're now managing Abhishek Jain's account` | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
The selector change is sharp, but let's make it sharper!
You've changed the element selection like how I changed the style of action scenes in cinema! But remember, in testing, like in movies, we need to be precise with our expectations.
Let's make it even more precise:
const messageElement = fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.delegated-acc');
expect(messageElement).toBeTruthy();
expect(messageElement.textContent.trim()).toBe(`You're now managing Abhishek Jain's account`);| import { RouterTestingModule } from '@angular/router/testing'; | ||
| import { of } from 'rxjs'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
NetworkService missing its spotlight in the test arena!
I checked the component, and it's clear that NetworkService plays a crucial role there. However, the test file doesn't cast this actor, leaving the switch-back functionality without complete coverage. Ensure you add a proper mock or stub for NetworkService in the test setup for the component.
- The component (src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts) correctly injects NetworkService.
- The spec file (src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.spec.ts) lacks a setup or mock for NetworkService.
🔗 Analysis chain
Mind-blowing additions, but where's the network service test setup, partner?
You've added RouterTestingModule for navigation testing, but I notice you haven't set up the NetworkService that's needed for the new switchBack functionality. Just like how I make a grand entrance in every scene, your tests should cover all the important actors!
Let me help you verify if NetworkService is used in the component:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if NetworkService is used in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'class DelegatedAccMessageComponent {
$$$
constructor($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NetworkService usage in the component implementation file
rg "NetworkService" src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.ts
Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if NetworkService is mocked or provided in the test configuration inside the spec file
rg "NetworkService" src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.spec.ts
Length of output: 107
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/shared/components/delegated-acc-message/delegated-acc-message.component.scss(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
- GitHub Check: build (12.x)
| <span class="delegated-acc"> | ||
| You're now managing {{ delegateeName | ellipsis : 15 }}'s account | ||
| <u class="u-link" [ngClass]="{ disabled: !isConnected$ | async }" (click)="switchBack()">Switch back</u> | ||
| </span> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Punch It Right: Fix the Async Pipe and Click Guard
Boss, the style is cool but be careful! Wrap the async pipe evaluation in parentheses so the negation applies to its result—not the observable itself. Use this:
<u class="u-link" [ngClass]="{ 'disabled': !(isConnected$ | async) }" (click)="(isConnected$ | async) ? switchBack() : null">Switch back</u>This way you ensure that the disabled style is applied correctly and the click event only fires when connected.
| .u-link { | ||
| color: inherit; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .u-link.disabled { | ||
| color: gray; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Style with a Bang: Enhance Pointer Visuals
Superstar, your link styles are almost legendary! To further impress, add visual cues by setting cursor: pointer; for interactive links and cursor: not-allowed; for the disabled state. For example:
.u-link {
- color: inherit;
+ color: inherit;
+ cursor: pointer;
}
.u-link.disabled {
- color: gray;
+ color: gray;
+ cursor: not-allowed;
}This will ensure that users know when the element is clickable and when it's not, just like a Rajinikanth punch!
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .u-link { | |
| color: inherit; | |
| } | |
| .u-link.disabled { | |
| color: gray; | |
| } | |
| .u-link { | |
| color: inherit; | |
| cursor: pointer; | |
| } | |
| .u-link.disabled { | |
| color: gray; | |
| cursor: not-allowed; | |
| } |
|
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cxvvrnw
Code Coverage
Please add code coverage here
UI Preview
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes