Skip to content

Check for format="input" as well as format="auto" in datatype linter #20177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias commented May 7, 2025

better consideration of auto and input

How to test the changes?

(Select all options that apply)

  • I've included appropriate automated tests.
  • This is a refactoring of components with existing test coverage.
  • Instructions for manual testing are as follows:
    1. [add testing steps and prerequisites here if you didn't write automated tests covering all your changes]

License

  • I agree to license these and all my past contributions to the core galaxy codebase under the MIT license.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 25.0 milestone May 7, 2025
@mvdbeek mvdbeek changed the title fix datatypes linter Check for format="input" as well as format="auto" in datatype linter May 9, 2025
@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

mvdbeek commented May 9, 2025

Unit tests look relevant ?

@mvdbeek mvdbeek removed this from the 25.0 milestone May 9, 2025
@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

mvdbeek commented May 9, 2025

Clearing the milestone, as a bug this can go in whenever

@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias force-pushed the lint-datatypes-auto-input branch from 95288bc to df6d007 Compare June 3, 2025 13:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 25.1 milestone Jun 4, 2025
@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias force-pushed the lint-datatypes-auto-input branch from a389f69 to 0ec9dd2 Compare August 4, 2025 08:01
better consideration of auto and inputs
@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias force-pushed the lint-datatypes-auto-input branch from 0ec9dd2 to 915e63b Compare August 4, 2025 08:02
@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let me know if I should target 25.0.

@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias requested a review from a team August 4, 2025 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants