Skip to content

ref(canary): Adding extra step to canary failures #920

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

IanWoodard
Copy link
Member

Adding link to canary guidance in canary failures

Copy link

linear bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.25%. Comparing base (4fdb63b) to head (46dff7d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #920   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.25%   89.25%           
=======================================
  Files         123      123           
  Lines        3805     3808    +3     
  Branches      775      777    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         3396     3399    +3     
  Misses        375      375           
  Partials       34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@IanWoodard IanWoodard merged commit 7196ebb into main Jul 21, 2025
12 checks passed
@IanWoodard IanWoodard deleted the ianwoodard/di-1003-add-link-to-canary-guidance-in-canary-failure-slack-message branch July 21, 2025 22:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants