Skip to content

Conversation

@ErichDonGubler
Copy link
Member

@ErichDonGubler ErichDonGubler commented Jan 26, 2026

Expressed roughly as a diff, shorten the output of this case like so:

 $ cargo xtask cts

 <snip>

 [WARN  wgpu_xtask::cts] fails-if conditions are only evaluated if a backend is specified with --backend
 [INFO  wgpu_xtask::cts] Reading default test list from cts_runner/test.lst
 [INFO  wgpu_xtask::cts] Cloning CTS shallowly with revision e98e602fe2cf38f73565c6529350453fdb616df6
 Cloning into 'cts'...
 remote: Enumerating objects: 8416, done.
 remote: Counting objects: 100% (8416/8416), done.
 remote: Compressing objects: 100% (4836/4836), done.
 remote: Total 8416 (delta 5890), reused 5391 (delta 3505), pack-reused 0 (from 0)
 Receiving objects: 100% (8416/8416), 11.84 MiB | 13.25 MiB/s, done.
 Resolving deltas: 100% (5890/5890), done.
-Note: switching to '7442e594a7bd99b1f2984d679051be41a5230b7a'.
-
-You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
-changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
-state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.
-
-If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
-do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:
-
-  git switch -c <new-branch-name>
-
-Or undo this operation with:
-
-  git switch -
-
-Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false
-
 Updating files: 100% (7404/7404), done.
 [INFO  wgpu_xtask::cts] Checking out CTS
 [INFO  wgpu_xtask::cts] Running CTS
 
 <snip>

@ErichDonGubler ErichDonGubler force-pushed the erichdongubler-push-bewildered-quadratic-apricot branch from f18c0d1 to a0eedef Compare January 26, 2026 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant