chore: Add missing license info in Cargo.toml files #354
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To avoid ambiguity in terms of licensing, explicitly provide a license parameters in the Cargo.toml of all packages in the repository. This should also help FOSSA, which currently struggles to determine the license for these crates. The license is set to Apache-2.0, as for the packages that already stated a license. Also mark the dataplane-id crate as non-publishable, for consistency with the other packages. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
|
This is very strange. I swear I already did this but I clearly did not. Good catch. Approved |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To avoid ambiguity in terms of licensing, explicitly provide a license parameters in the Cargo.toml of all packages in the repository. This should also help FOSSA, which currently struggles to determine the license for these crates.
The license is set to Apache-2.0, as for the packages that already stated a license.
Relates to #332