Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(architecture): add Fabric Management page #71

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pau-hedgehog
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pau-hedgehog pau-hedgehog self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

🚀 Deployed on https://preview-71--hedgehog-docs.netlify.app

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request March 5, 2025 22:54 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request March 7, 2025 14:40 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request March 7, 2025 15:12 Inactive
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request March 21, 2025 10:10 Inactive
@pau-hedgehog pau-hedgehog marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 10:24
@pau-hedgehog pau-hedgehog requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 10:24
@pau-hedgehog pau-hedgehog requested a review from edipascale March 21, 2025 10:24

### **K9s**
- A Kubernetes UI that provides visibility and control over Kubernetes resources, allowing you to manage pods, nodes, services, logs, and Fabric resources efficiently. It includes some helper plugins:
- **SSH** – SSH into a fabric switch
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these are hhfab utils, not k9s - shouldn't they go under fabricator?

@edipascale
Copy link
Contributor

this looks good @pau-hedgehog, my only concern is that I feel there's a big overlap between the first section in this PR and what you previously added in the architecture overview section, and I wonder whether we should just collapse the two sections into one. That being said, having more documentation is never a bad thing, so I'm not against adding this if you / other people feel that they're better kept separate.

@mrbojangles3
Copy link
Contributor

I support adding it. I can see that a user might say, what happens when I do X, Y or Z. They would have those questions answered in the Fabric Management Workflow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants