feat(fingreprinting): add .taskignore

[GeneTakavic24]

Fixes #1753

[GeneTakavic24]

Greetings, and thanks for a wonderful project!

The reasoning behind this PR is as follows:

Design

Since the project already heavily relies on glob semantics, aligning the same semantics in the Taskfile's exclude: section and .taskignore can provide the following benefits:

1. Unified Pattern Usage: End users can use patterns interchangeably across the exclude: section and .taskignore.

• The exclude: section currently does not support the same negation pattern semantics as .gitignore.

• If .taskignore strictly follows .gitignore semantics, it might cause confusion and a disjointed interface for users needing consistent formatting across both.

• On the other hand, modifying exclude to follow .gitignore semantics would introduce breaking changes, as exclude no longer adheres to the glob pattern syntax.

2. Change scope is smaller

• Parsing .gitignore even with the usage of a library such as lib provided might need to change the Glob structure:
  as well as fingerprinting functionality to combine both exisiting glob parsing and .gitignore-like parsing.
  

  task/taskfile/ast/glob.go

  Lines 9 to 12 in c28eb20

  	type Glob struct {
  	Glob string
  	Negate bool
  	}

[adamdicarlo0]

nit: I would add "a" -- that is, change

[...] creating .taskignore file [...]

to

[...] creating a .taskignore file [...]

[adamdicarlo0]

Suggest adding a comment line to make sure comments are correctly processed:

# ./dont_ignore.txt

[adamdicarlo0]

Also some blank lines to make sure trimming also works correctly.

[adamdicarlo0]

Users might expect that end-line comments (e.g., ./**/*.json # ignore pesky JSON files) are allowed, as they tend to be allowed in similar file formats.

[adamdicarlo0]

Looks pretty good to me.

If exclude supports negations, I would clarify in the docs and code whether negations are allowed in the .taskignore file (and unit test it).

I'm not sure whether they'd be supported, from looking at the code (I don't recall whether exclude supports them).

NB: I am not a maintainer or (at least not yet) even a contributor to the project!

[thcrt]

It would be great to see this merged!

[maciej-lech]

Any plans for merging this?