📒 docs: Add documentation for Stale() #3555
Conversation
WalkthroughDocumentation comments for the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses entirely on improving the documentation for the Stale() method. It corrects outdated internal comments and provides a comprehensive explanation in the public API documentation, ensuring that users and developers have accurate and complete information regarding its behavior and purpose.
Highlights
- GoDoc Comment Update: I've updated the GoDoc comments for the
Stale()method in bothctx.goandctx_interface_gen.go. Previously, these comments incorrectly stated that the method was 'not implemented yet', but they now accurately reflect thatStale()returnstruewhen the client's cached response is considered stale. - Public API Documentation Enhancement: I've added a new, detailed explanation for the
Stale()method within thedocs/api/ctx.mdfile. This new content clarifies its functionality, stating that it returnstruefor stale cached responses and explicitly notes its logical complement relationship with theFresh()method.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Adds missing documentation and implementation for the Stale() method on the context interface.
- Introduces a description for
Stale()in the API docs - Updates the generated interface comment to match the implementation
- Implements
Stale()inDefaultCtxas the complement ofFresh()
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/api/ctx.md | Added a docblock explaining Stale() and its relationship to Fresh() |
| ctx_interface_gen.go | Replaced the placeholder comment with a proper doc comment for Stale() |
| ctx.go | Implemented Stale() to return !c.Fresh() and updated its doc comment |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
ctx.go:1888
- Add unit tests for the
Stale()method to verify both stale (whenFresh()returns false) and non-stale scenarios.
func (c *DefaultCtx) Stale() bool {
docs/api/ctx.md:1347
- [nitpick] For consistency with the
Freshdocs (which refer to the 'cached representation'), consider using 'representation' instead of 'response' here.
When the client's cached response is **stale**, this method returns **true**. It
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances the documentation for the Stale() method by adding descriptions in both the Go source files and the API documentation. Minor suggestions have been made to improve the clarity and consistency of the comments in the Go source files.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
ctx.go (1)
1887-1890: Docstring looks good – may referenceFresh()for quicker navigationThe new comment correctly explains the method’s behaviour.
As a (very) small enhancement you could mention that it is the logical negation ofFresh()– it helps readers immediately understand the relation without scrolling.ctx_interface_gen.go (1)
328-329: Comment improvement suggestionThe wording is clear; consider adding “(i.e. the logical complement of
Fresh())" to mirror the wording used inctx.goand the docs page so all three locations stay perfectly in-sync.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
ctx.go(1 hunks)ctx_interface_gen.go(1 hunks)docs/api/ctx.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
ctx.go (4)
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
ctx_interface_gen.go (1)
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, macos-13)
- GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: repeated
- GitHub Check: lint
- GitHub Check: Compare
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/api/ctx.md (1)
1347-1350: Docs addition looks clear and accurateThe explanation correctly describes the behaviour of
Stale()and referencesFresh()with a valid anchor. No further changes needed.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3555 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.91% 90.91%
=======================================
Files 110 110
Lines 11073 11073
=======================================
Hits 10067 10067
Misses 751 751
Partials 255 255
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Stale()