Skip to content

Conversation

@MBkkt
Copy link
Contributor

@MBkkt MBkkt commented Jan 6, 2023

}
if (level == true_max_level || !options_.optimize_for_space()) {
// Add an ancestor term for this cell at the constrained level.
terms.push_back(GetTerm(TermType::ANCESTOR, id.parent(level), prefix));
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MBkkt MBkkt Jan 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

id.parent(level) == id is always true here because level == id.level() see old line 177 (or new 192)

@jmr
Copy link
Member

jmr commented Jan 6, 2023

Having 6 PRs in 1 will quickly become unwieldy. Please split up future PRs for easier disucssion.

@MBkkt
Copy link
Contributor Author

MBkkt commented Jan 6, 2023

Having 6 PRs in 1 will quickly become unwieldy. Please split up future PRs for easier disucssion.

Will be done

@smcallis
Copy link
Contributor

smcallis commented Jan 6, 2023

Yeah let's split this one up we can probably submit the others separate from the term indexer one.

@MBkkt
Copy link
Contributor Author

MBkkt commented Jan 9, 2023

@jmr @smcallis Hello, I created separate PRs (found asan issue and add tests for new option) can you look they?

@jmr
Copy link
Member

jmr commented Jan 9, 2023

Closing this since it's been split into #298, #299, #300, #301, #302, and #303.

@jmr jmr closed this Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants