Skip to content

Conversation

@ArtemTrofimushkin
Copy link

Fixes #488

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 30, 2023
@erikgeiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR. I didn't have time to read it completely, yet, but I took a glance at the changes. Maybe Distribution and Urgency should be required to set. I'm not sure that setting them automatically to unstable and medium makes sense as we don't even know what is being packaged and for which distro. If people want the metadata these values should probably be deliberate.

@ArtemTrofimushkin
Copy link
Author

@erikgeiser Thanks for the explanation.
Updated the PR to make these fields required (removed default values in SetPackagerDefaults)

Copy link
Member

@caarlos0 caarlos0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey, thanks for the PR, sorry I missed it earlier...

this LGTM, I believe its only missing the docs changes... can you add them too?

Thanks!

@caarlos0 caarlos0 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2023
@caarlos0 caarlos0 modified the milestones: v2.35.0, 2.36.0 Dec 17, 2023
@caarlos0 caarlos0 modified the milestones: 2.36.0, 2.37.0, 2.38.0 May 8, 2024
@caarlos0
Copy link
Member

caarlos0 commented Jul 6, 2024

hey! sorry for the delay reviewing this...

lets merge it with main and get it in for v2.39?

@caarlos0 caarlos0 modified the milestones: 2.38.0, 2.39.0 Jul 6, 2024
@ArtemTrofimushkin ArtemTrofimushkin force-pushed the feature/deb-package-changes branch from f5515f6 to 15fa92e Compare September 4, 2024 11:11
@ArtemTrofimushkin
Copy link
Author

Hello @caarlos0 !
I'm very sorry for loong delay, let's try to merge changes?

@caarlos0
Copy link
Member

caarlos0 commented Sep 5, 2024

hey, seems like there are some tests failing, can you take a look?

@ArtemTrofimushkin
Copy link
Author

@caarlos0 all fixed. Locally all tests passed. Can you run all checks again?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 65.82278% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.91%. Comparing base (db338d0) to head (708cb47).
⚠️ Report is 174 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/cmd/package.go 0.00% 17 Missing ⚠️
deb/deb_meta.go 82.75% 5 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #612      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.16%   72.91%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          22       23       +1     
  Lines        2493     2570      +77     
==========================================
+ Hits         1824     1874      +50     
- Misses        463      485      +22     
- Partials      206      211       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Generate .changes files for debian packages

3 participants