-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enhance(ResolveFieldValue): note that list items may be async #1066
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for graphql-spec-draft ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
@graphql/tsc -- I think this could count as an editorial change? It is currently implemented within graphql-js on main as part of the incremental delivery alpha/beta, has not been released... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please restore the paragraph breaks which will both minimise the diff and restore the formatting of the note (which has special handling in spec-md).
Done, thanks! |
and some baseline collection language for comparison extracted from graphql#742 Authored-by: Rob Richard <[email protected]>
Review feedback
7a6fdc0
to
32b7716
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor wording suggestions
6a4d7c6
to
32053c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, and despite being non-normative this already aligns with the behavior of GraphQL.js. I think we can flag this as an editorial note.
@graphql/tsc This PR extends the non-normative note about resolvers being asynchronous to also note that each entry in a list returned from a resolver can itself be asynchronous. Please either approve or express your concerns - thanks! |
and some baseline collection language for comparison
extracted from #742