Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC/To-think-about: are these usages of Gen.justT potentially problematic? #980

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

RFC/To-think-about: are these usages of Gen.justT potentially problematic? #980

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Commits on May 12, 2023

  1. RFC/To-think-about: are these usages of Gen.justT potentially problem… 

    …atic?

This commit should either
- stay roughly the same, but with an explanatory commit message
- or morph into adding some comments as to why these 'Gen.justT' are fine

Note that these have been here since the beginning, and justT was
introduced when genAPP was written 'genAPP = justT $ do ...'
    @brprice
    brprice committed May 12, 2023
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f510a4f View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history