Skip to content

Update payload.txt1 #541

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update payload.txt1 #541

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Duck43233
Copy link

stuffmlb

DELAY 1000
CTRL-ALT t
DELAY 2000


function remove_folder {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this meant to be inside a STRINGLN block?

REM ##########################################

TOKEN=your_dropbox_token
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not the proper way to set a variable within Duckyscript

DEFINE #TOKEN your_dropbox_token

REM Requirements:
REM - Internet Connection
REM - Discord Webhook

mkdir -p $DIR
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not proper Duckyscript syntax, is this meant to be executed on the target machine?

@hak5peaks
Copy link
Member

Also, as this is a change to anther users payload, it requires review from the original author @aleff-github

@hak5peaks hak5peaks added invalid This doesn't seem right pending requested changes requires changes before merge awaiting response waiting for response labels May 25, 2025
@aleff-github
Copy link
Contributor

Also, as this is a change to anther users payload, it requires review from the original author @aleff-github

I don't have a way to test the payload at this time, so (@Duck43233) perhaps including a description of the new features in the Pull Request would help me understand what it's about.

In general, I usually agree with the new versions proposed by users, but given @hak5peaks' suggestions, I would prefer to wait for an official and corrected version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting response waiting for response invalid This doesn't seem right pending requested changes requires changes before merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants