-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_auto_upgrade_profile
- new resource
#30902
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_auto_upgrade_profile
- new resource
#30902
Conversation
Replaces usage of the Azure Container Service SDK version 2019-08-01 with 2023-03-02-preview. Removes all vendor files for the old and new SDK versions, and updates internal service implementations and tests to align with the new SDK structure and APIs.
Replaces usage of the Azure Container Service SDK version 2019-08-01 with 2023-03-02-preview. Removes all vendor files for the old and new SDK versions, and updates internal service implementations and tests to align with the new SDK structure and APIs. Update labeler-issue-triage.yml udate
Updated the referenced Azure API Provider version from 2024-04-01 to 2025-03-01 in documentation for Kubernetes Fleet Manager, Auto Upgrade Profile, Update Run, and Update Strategy resources. Added API Providers section to the auto upgrade profile documentation for consistency.
…hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq/terraform-provider-azurerm into feat/aks_fleet_auto_upgrade-2
Replaces fixed 'default' value validation with a regex and length check for the 'name' argument in KubernetesFleetAutoUpgradeProfileResource. Updates documentation to reflect the new validation requirements and clarify resource creation behavior.
Config: r.basic(data), | ||
Check: acceptance.ComposeTestCheckFunc( | ||
check.That(data.ResourceName).ExistsInAzure(r), | ||
check.That(data.ResourceName).Key("channel").HasValue("Stable"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to add these checks, because there's an import step to verify the state and config.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thx done
) | ||
|
||
type AutoClient struct { | ||
V20240401 containerservice_2024_04_01.Client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to use pandora to update the SDK first?
Community Note
Description
PR Checklist
For example: “
resource_name_here
- description of change e.g. adding propertynew_property_name_here
”Changes to existing Resource / Data Source
Testing
Change Log
Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.
azurerm_resource
- support for thething1
property [GH-00000]This is a (please select all that apply):
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #0000
AI Assistance Disclosure
Rollback Plan
If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the provider.
Changes to Security Controls
Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.
Note
If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.