Update Rust crate rand to v0.9.2

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
rand (source)	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.9.1 -> =0.9.2

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

rust-random/rand (rand)

v0.9.2

Deprecated

• Deprecate rand::rngs::mock module and StepRng generator (#​1634)

Additions

• Enable WeightedIndex<usize> (de)serialization (#​1646)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.81%. Comparing base (7364656) to head (13c6629).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7665      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.81%   52.81%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1108     1108              
  Lines       99108    99108              
  Branches     4519     4519              
==========================================
- Hits        52343    52342       -1     
- Misses      45781    45782       +1     
  Partials      984      984              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.68% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	83.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	95.83% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	75.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	34.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	32.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	86.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	51.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	71.42% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	85.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.52 \mathrm{s} \pm 544 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$248 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$66.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.904 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$259 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.61 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$233 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$279 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.68 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$188 \mathrm{ms} \pm 950 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$247 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$253 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.70 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 804 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 646 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 722 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 962 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 651 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph