Update Rust crate test-fuzz to v7.2.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
test-fuzz	workspace.dependencies	patch	=7.2.0 -> =7.2.1

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

trailofbits/test-fuzz (test-fuzz)

v7.2.1

Compare Source

• Upgrade darling to version 0.21 (#​580)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.81%. Comparing base (7364656) to head (da3ca50).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7666   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.81%   52.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1108     1108           
  Lines       99108    99108           
  Branches     4519     4519           
=======================================
+ Hits        52343    52344    +1     
- Misses      45781    45782    +1     
+ Partials      984      982    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.68% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	83.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	95.86% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	75.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	34.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	32.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	86.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	51.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	71.42% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	85.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.294 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.373 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.54 \mathrm{s} \pm 548 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$251 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$264 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.99 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$240 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.82 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$284 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.32 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$193 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.38 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$254 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.37 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$263 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.57 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.904 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 777 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$152 \mathrm{ms} \pm 927 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 718 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 590 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph