Skip to content

Conversation

@tobil4sk
Copy link
Contributor

@tobil4sk tobil4sk commented Nov 9, 2025

In haxe 5, enum constructors no longer take priority over class names, so this gives:

Abstract<tink.core.Progress> cannot be called

See haxe issues:
HaxeFoundation/haxe#9197
HaxeFoundation/haxe#11168

In haxe 5, enum constructors no longer take priority over class names,
so this gives:

Abstract<tink.core.Progress> cannot be called

See haxe issues:
HaxeFoundation/haxe#9197
HaxeFoundation/haxe#11168
@back2dos back2dos merged commit 00c24a3 into haxetink:master Nov 13, 2025
1 of 20 checks passed
@tobil4sk tobil4sk deleted the fix/haxe5 branch November 13, 2025 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants