Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to talc memory allocator #809

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023
Merged

Migrate to talc memory allocator #809

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023

Conversation

mkroening
Copy link
Member

@mkroening mkroening commented Jul 28, 2023

Closes #630.

#803 has even further enhancements, but this might be a first step.

@mkroening mkroening requested a review from stlankes July 28, 2023 09:54
Copy link
Contributor

@stlankes stlankes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we not remove the bump allocator? But it is a good first step.

@mkroening
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. I was interested in the AArch64 run failure and figured a fix and simple migration might be good for comparison.

So I'll merge this as a first step. :)

Removing the bump allocator might make sense, but measuring that on its own would be interesting.

@mkroening mkroening added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 28, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 24219de Jul 28, 2023
8 checks passed
@mkroening mkroening deleted the new-talc branch July 28, 2023 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider galloc - good_memory_allocator
2 participants