Skip to content

Conversation

@colincasey
Copy link
Contributor

Since pnpm v10.5.0 made the packages field optional, this could cause the logic that would skip pruning for pnpm workspaces to misbehave for projects that did not declare this key.

Fixes #1491, W-20838465

Since pnpm [v10.5.0](https://github.com/pnpm/pnpm/releases/tag/v10.5.0) made the `packages` field optional, this could cause the logic that would skip pruning for pnpm workspaces to misbehave for projects that did not declare this key.

Fixes #1491, [W-20838465](https://gus.lightning.force.com/a07EE00002SaizkYAB)
@colincasey colincasey self-assigned this Jan 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Buildpack misinterpreting pnpm workspaces

1 participant