Skip to content

Fix/event replay perf#1572

Closed
zone117x wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix/event-replay-perf
Closed

Fix/event replay perf#1572
zone117x wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix/event-replay-perf

Conversation

@zone117x
Copy link
Contributor

@zone117x zone117x commented Mar 3, 2023

Removes the temporary pg table used during event-replay. This was originally in place to handle tsv files that contains 1) duplicate events, and 2) out of order events.

Now that we no longer support live appending to tsv files (only direct exports), we should no longer be dealing with these types of "dirty" tsv files.

This should be a performance improvement now that postgres no longer has to serve reads from the temp table while also writing events during ingestion.

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to commit March 3, 2023 19:17 Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2023

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request March 3, 2023 19:19 Inactive
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage: 78.18% (+1.09%) from 77.086% when pulling a594ffc on fix/event-replay-perf into e2b58b2 on master.

@zone117x
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will likely be built upon later on when we tackle event-replay perf. Leaving this PR open as draft for now.

@rafaelcr rafaelcr closed this Jan 5, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In Progress to ✅ Done in API Board Jan 5, 2026
@rafaelcr rafaelcr deleted the fix/event-replay-perf branch January 5, 2026 20:49
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/event-replay/event-replay.ts 93.75% 1 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments