add analog 8ch mux/demux #323
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Bot!
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Member
|
The dual power is a bit funky, @carrotIndustries any ideas? |
Contributor
Author
|
Bot!
|
|
This review is brought to you by the Horizon EDA Poolbot commit 33131f8. Items in this PR
Parts overview (excluding derived)Bold items are from this PR
Derived partsBold items are from this PR
Parts tableValues in italic are inherited
DetailsPartsbase TSSOP-16 MUX/DEMUX 8ch with EN✔️ Checks passed
Flags
74HC4051PWInerhits from base TSSOP-16 MUX/DEMUX 8ch with EN ✔️ Checks passed
EntitiesSingle MUX/DEMUX 8ch with EN✔️ Checks passed
UnitsDual power with GND✔️ Checks passed
Symbol: Dual power with GND✔️ Checks passed
Single-ended MUX/DEMUX 8ch with EN✔️ Checks passed
Symbol: MUX/DEMUX 8ch with EN✔️ Checks passed
|
github-actions
bot
added
bot: pass
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As always bot will fail because base part doesn't have description.
I'm not sure about multiplexer's I/O naming. I made base part according Nexperia datasheet where channels named Y0, Y1,..., Y7, and output (let's call it so) named Z. On internet I found many examples with different namings. Our logic components (AND, OR, XOR.....) already in pool uses letters A, B, C, .... for channels and 'Y' for output. Maybe I should continue that way.... Every manufacturer uses their own naming for multiplexer's I/Os...