Skip to content

Argyll: Send SIGTERM instead of SIGQUIT to the Argyll processes #196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2025

Conversation

bigon
Copy link
Collaborator

@bigon bigon commented Jun 23, 2025

Sending SIGQUIT causes them to generate a coredump

Fixes: #189

Sending SIGQUIT causes them to generate a coredump

Fixes: hughsie#189
…ibration is finished

Let's try to be good citizens
@bigon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bigon commented Jul 15, 2025

@hughsie do you think you would have time to review this?

@bigon bigon merged commit ab24f11 into hughsie:main Jul 16, 2025
@bigon bigon deleted the fix189 branch July 16, 2025 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

colord sending SIGQUIT to spotread
2 participants