Skip to content

style: use common utils package (api and app) #555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

wrn14897
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ec0797d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@wrn14897 wrn14897 changed the title style: use common utils package (api and app) (WIP) style: use common utils package (api and app) Jan 16, 2025
@wrn14897 wrn14897 changed the title (WIP) style: use common utils package (api and app) style: use common utils package (api and app) Jan 17, 2025
MikeShi42
MikeShi42 previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2025
@wrn14897 wrn14897 force-pushed the warren/use-common-utils-pkg branch from 06151b3 to 92a6fed Compare January 21, 2025 08:47
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit a70080e into v2 Jan 21, 2025
4 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the warren/use-common-utils-pkg branch January 21, 2025 18:44
};

export const metadata = new Metadata();
export const getMetadata = () => _getMetadata(getClickhouseClient());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did we change this from a singleton? aren't we creating a ton of new metadata objects without reason?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants