Used semi-emperical mass formula to avoid testing with ridiculous nuclides

[MicahGale]

Pull Request Checklist for MontePy

Description

Trying to find a physically realistic nuclide is not straight forward. So in the past hypothesis has come up with some wild nuclides, that broke MontePy's meta-state detection system, namely Bk-187. This updates the test suite to calculate the binding energy (using the semi-empirical mass formula) for heavier elements (> iron), and rule out nuclides with low binding energy per nuclide, and exclude them from the test suite. This was based on this curve.

Fixes #818

---

General Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• The code follows the standards outlined in the development documentation.
• I have formatted my code with black version 25.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable).

---

LLM Disclosure

Were any large language models (LLM or "AI") used in to generate any of this code?

• Yes
  • Model(s) used:
• No

Documentation Checklist

• I have documented all added classes and methods.
• For infrastructure updates, I have updated the developer's guide.
• For significant new features, I have added a section to the getting started guide.

---

First-Time Contributor Checklist

• If this is your first contribution, add yourself to pyproject.toml if you wish to do so.

---

Additional Notes for Reviewers

Ensure that:

• This PR fully addresses and resolves the referenced issue(s).
• The submitted code is consistent with the merge checklist outlined here.
• The PR covers all relevant aspects according to the development guidelines.
• 100% coverage of the patch is achieved, or justification for a variance is given.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://montepy--851.org.readthedocs.build/en/851/