Skip to content

Conversation

@GiudGiud
Copy link
Contributor

@GiudGiud GiudGiud commented Nov 5, 2025

bunch of heuristics lumped together to make it work.
I somewhat doubt we'll find a way to have a unique perfect solution here, and I also don't doubt that the next time I'll use this I'll add another heuristic for the new case

refs #31851

@GiudGiud GiudGiud self-assigned this Nov 5, 2025
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Nov 5, 2025

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on fc9fd02 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Test, step Results summary on fc9fd02 wanted to post the following:

Framework test summary

Compared against fe4ab42 in job civet.inl.gov/job/3359230.

Removed tests

Added tests

Test Time (s)
meshgenerators/polyline_following_nodeset_mesh_generator.2d_channel 0.82

Run time changes

Modules test summary

Compared against fe4ab42 in job civet.inl.gov/job/3359230.

Removed tests

Added tests

Run time changes

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on fc9fd02 wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

fe4ab4 #31852 fc9fd0
Total Total +/- New
Rate 86.02% 86.03% +0.01% 100.00%
Hits 124621 124730 +109 117
Misses 20254 20262 +8 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

This comment will be updated on new commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants