Added CoupledInjectionProductionPhysics

[joshuahansel]

Closes #31899

[moosebuild]

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on d907db8 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[moosebuild]

Job Test, step Results summary on d907db8 wanted to post the following:

Framework test summary

Compared against 7edd10c in job civet.inl.gov/job/3374418.

No change

Modules test summary

Compared against 7edd10c in job civet.inl.gov/job/3374418.

Added tests

Test	Time (s)
porous_flow/test:physics/coupled_injection_production_physics.test	1.12

[moosebuild]

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on d907db8 wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

Coverage did not change

Modules coverage

Porous flow

	7edd10	#31900 d907db
	Total	Total	+/-	New
Rate	95.49%	95.54%	+0.04%	100.00%
Hits	11422	11497	+75	73
Misses	539	537	-2	0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Full coverage reports

Reports

• framework
• chemical_reactions
• combined
• contact
• electromagnetics
• external_petsc_solver
• fluid_properties
• fsi
• functional_expansion_tools
• geochemistry
• heat_transfer
• level_set
• misc
• navier_stokes
• optimization
• peridynamics
• phase_field
• porous_flow
• ray_tracing
• rdg
• reactor
• richards
• scalar_transport
• solid_mechanics
• solid_properties
• stochastic_tools
• subchannel
• thermal_hydraulics
• xfem

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[grmnptr]

Pretty cool capability! Let's also wait for the code owner review!

[joshuahansel]

Pretty cool capability! Let's also wait for the code owner review!

Being a frequent code owner I can tell you that this is usually ignored 😄 @cpgr any objections with this? It is used in some coupling work I am doing between THM and porous flow. Once all of the pieces are in place, I should have a decent example in Falcon.

[cpgr]

Pretty cool capability! Let's also wait for the code owner review!

Being a frequent code owner I can tell you that this is usually ignored 😄 @cpgr any objections with this? It is used in some coupling work I am doing between THM and porous flow. Once all of the pieces are in place, I should have a decent example in Falcon.

I always miss these code owner ones too!

Would this allow us to easily do porous media flow for a reservoir coupled to non-porous media flow in a well? Sounds like a good thing to me

[joshuahansel]

Would this allow us to easily do porous media flow for a reservoir coupled to non-porous media flow in a well?

Yes, this is the coupling I've been working on. The wells are 1D pipes from THM and are coupled through junctions via MultiApps.

[cpgr]

Would this allow us to easily do porous media flow for a reservoir coupled to non-porous media flow in a well?

Yes, this is the coupling I've been working on. The wells are 1D pipes from THM and are coupled through junctions via MultiApps.

Great! This will be super useful to me too. Thanks for this