Skip to content

[Imported] Fix #493 : Correct mention of Protobuf in RPC frameworks with mention of gRPC #413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 133 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ido777
Copy link
Owner

@ido777 ido777 commented Apr 6, 2025

Imported from donnemartin/system-design-primer#494

Original author: @aymec


See #493

neesara and others added 25 commits July 3, 2020 21:22
* Additional question, build an exchange

fixes donnemartin#281

* Update README.md

Co-authored-by: Donne Martin <[email protected]>
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 6, 2025 20:37
@ido777
Copy link
Owner Author

ido777 commented Apr 6, 2025

Imported comment from @tvladyslav

Thats right, Protobuf is responsible for interface description. It is not a standalone RPC solution.

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@ido777
Copy link
Owner Author

ido777 commented Apr 6, 2025

Imported review by @duynguyenhoang

State: APPROVED

LGTM

@ido777 ido777 force-pushed the imported-pr-494 branch from 9338f16 to 50efdd3 Compare May 14, 2025 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.