Bugfix: Pass correct virtual size to CheckPackageLimits

src/txmempool.cpp

@@ -197,13 +197,12 @@ util::Result<CTxMemPool::setEntries> CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimit
 }
 
 bool CTxMemPool::CheckPackageLimits(const Package& package,
+                                    const int64_t total_vsize,
                                     const Limits& limits,
                                     std::string &errString) const
 {
     CTxMemPoolEntry::Parents staged_ancestors;
-    int64_t total_size = 0;
     for (const auto& tx : package) {
-        total_size += GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx);
         for (const auto& input : tx->vin) {
             std::optional<txiter> piter = GetIter(input.prevout.hash);
             if (piter) {
@@ -218,7 +217,7 @@ bool CTxMemPool::CheckPackageLimits(const Package& package,
     // When multiple transactions are passed in, the ancestors and descendants of all transactions
     // considered together must be within limits even if they are not interdependent. This may be
     // stricter than the limits for each individual transaction.
-    const auto ancestors{CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(total_size, package.size(),
+    const auto ancestors{CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits(total_vsize, package.size(),
                                                           staged_ancestors, limits)};
     // It's possible to overestimate the ancestor/descendant totals.
     if (!ancestors.has_value()) errString = "possibly " + util::ErrorString(ancestors).original;

src/txmempool.h

@@ -606,10 +606,12 @@ class CTxMemPool
      * @param[in]       package                 Transaction package being evaluated for acceptance
      *                                          to mempool. The transactions need not be direct
      *                                          ancestors/descendants of each other.
+     * @param[in]       total_vsize             Sum of virtual sizes for all transactions in package.
      * @param[in]       limits                  Maximum number and size of ancestors and descendants
      * @param[out]      errString               Populated with error reason if a limit is hit.
      */
     bool CheckPackageLimits(const Package& package,
+                            int64_t total_vsize,
                             const Limits& limits,
                             std::string &errString) const EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
 

src/validation.cpp

@@ -634,6 +634,7 @@ class MemPoolAccept
     // Enforce package mempool ancestor/descendant limits (distinct from individual
     // ancestor/descendant limits done in PreChecks).
     bool PackageMempoolChecks(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txns,
+                              int64_t total_vsize,
                               PackageValidationState& package_state) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main, m_pool.cs);
 
     // Run the script checks using our policy flags. As this can be slow, we should
@@ -1000,6 +1001,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::ReplacementChecks(Workspace& ws)
 }
 
 bool MemPoolAccept::PackageMempoolChecks(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txns,
+                                         const int64_t total_vsize,
                                          PackageValidationState& package_state)
 {
     AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
@@ -1010,7 +1012,7 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PackageMempoolChecks(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txn
                        { return !m_pool.exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx->GetHash()));}));
 
     std::string err_string;
-    if (!m_pool.CheckPackageLimits(txns, m_limits, err_string)) {
+    if (!m_pool.CheckPackageLimits(txns, total_vsize, m_limits, err_string)) {
         // This is a package-wide error, separate from an individual transaction error.
         return package_state.Invalid(PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY, "package-mempool-limits", err_string);
     }
@@ -1295,7 +1297,7 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions(const std::
     // because it's unnecessary. Also, CPFP carve out can increase the limit for individual
     // transactions, but this exemption is not extended to packages in CheckPackageLimits().
     std::string err_string;
-    if (txns.size() > 1 && !PackageMempoolChecks(txns, package_state)) {
+    if (txns.size() > 1 && !PackageMempoolChecks(txns, m_total_vsize, package_state)) {
         return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
     }