[Integrate] Cherry-pick llvm/llvm-project@41f6566

[Yu-Zhewen]

Still carrying two reverts as #22366.

New cherry-picks:

• [MLIR] Revamp RegionBranchOpInterface (llvm/llvm-project@41f6566)
• Corresponding torch-mlir fix (Integrate LLVM at 41f65666f6378bba7266be7c662c70074f04ed75 llvm/torch-mlir#4358)

Also, IREE fixes on RegionBranchPoint and RegionSuccessor.

ci-extra: test_torch, windows_x64_msvc

[hanhanW]

Why don't we bump ahead of the commit instead?

Also, can you list out all the current cherry-picked commits in PR description?

[Yu-Zhewen]

Why don't we bump ahead of the commit instead?

Also, can you list out all the current cherry-picked commits in PR description?

Only doing the cherry-pick because I thought it might be clearer when it also involves changes in torch-mlir, but I don’t have a strong opinion.

[hanhanW]

Why don't we bump ahead of the commit instead?
Also, can you list out all the current cherry-picked commits in PR description?

Only doing the cherry-pick because I thought it might be clearer when it also involves changes in torch-mlir, but I don’t have a strong opinion.

It sounds okay to me; we can move forward. My suggestion is making the state clean in PR description, so the next build gardener can pick up the context easier. (I think I'm on rotation next week.)

Are you going to start a new bump tomorrow?

[Yu-Zhewen]

Why don't we bump ahead of the commit instead?
Also, can you list out all the current cherry-picked commits in PR description?

Only doing the cherry-pick because I thought it might be clearer when it also involves changes in torch-mlir, but I don’t have a strong opinion.

It sounds okay to me; we can move forward. My suggestion is making the state clean in PR description, so the next build gardener can pick up the context easier. (I think I'm on rotation next week.)

Are you going to start a new bump tomorrow?

Yes, I’ll start another bump right afterward. Already have it prepared locally.