Skip to content

📝 Added known issues page and timeout bug info #606

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

devtobi
Copy link
Member

@devtobi devtobi commented Jul 24, 2025

Pull Request

Changes

  • Added known issues page
  • Added information about timeout bug

Reference

Issue: #598

Checklist

Note: If some checklist items are not relevant for your PR, just remove them.

General

  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines (TBD)
  • Met all acceptance criteria of the issue
  • Added meaningful PR title and list of changes in the description
  • Created / Updated documentation (in English)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a "Known Issues" page to the documentation, listing current known issues and guidance for reporting new ones.
    • Updated the documentation navigation to include a direct link to the "Known Issues" page in both the top navigation bar and a new "Support" section in the sidebar.

@devtobi devtobi requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2025 11:20
@devtobi devtobi linked an issue Jul 24, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

A new "Known Issues" documentation page was created, listing known bugs and configuration issues for various components, with most sections stating no current issues. The Vitepress documentation site's navigation was updated to include links to this page in both the top navigation bar and a new Support sidebar section.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/.vitepress/config.mts Updated navigation: added "Known Issues" link to top nav bar and created a Support sidebar section.
docs/support/known-issues.md Added new markdown file listing known issues for components; only one specific backend config issue noted.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through docs anew,
With "Known Issues" now in view.
Sidebar and dropdown, easy to find,
For bugs and quirks of every kind.
Most are clear, no issues here—
Except one backend tale to fear!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Type: Bug The issue is a bug Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation labels Jul 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/.vitepress/config.mts (2)

39-40: Consider moving “Known Issues” out of the “Docs” dropdown

The target path lives under /support/*, so lumping it into the Docs group feels semantically off. A dedicated top-level nav item (e.g. { text: "Support", link: "/support/known-issues" }) would make the IA clearer and avoid coupling support content with product docs.

Example diff:

-      {
-        text: "Docs",
+      {
+        text: "Docs",
         items: [
@@
-          { text: "OpenAPI", link: "/cross-cutting-concepts/openapi" },
-          { text: "Known Issues", link: "/support/known-issues" },
+          { text: "OpenAPI", link: "/cross-cutting-concepts/openapi" },
         ],
       },
+      { text: "Support", link: "/support/known-issues" },

93-101: Add a link to the “Support” sidebar group for one-click access

Groups without a link render as non-clickable headings. Supplying the same page path gives users a quick entry point.

-      {
-        text: "Support",
-        items: [
+      {
+        text: "Support",
+        link: "/support/known-issues",
+        items: [
docs/support/known-issues.md (1)

30-35: Correct typos and unify spelling

Small language fixes improve professionalism.

-#### Timeout on SSO misconfiguration or audience claim mismatch
-When the configured SSO URLs in the `refarch-backend` and API gateway do not match, trying to access a secured endpoint in the backend via the API gateway results in a timout.
-The same behaviour occurs when the names of the expected audience claims do not match.
+#### Timeout on SSO misconfiguration or audience claim mismatch
+When the configured SSO URLs in the `refarch-backend` and API gateway do not match, accessing a secured endpoint in the backend via the API gateway results in a timeout.
+The same behavior occurs when the names of the expected audience claims do not match.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c705557 and 6358f39.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/.vitepress/config.mts (2 hunks)
  • docs/support/known-issues.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/support/known-issues.md

[style] ~6-~6: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...e provide. ::: info Information If you found an issue not mentioned here, please hea...

(FIND_ENCOUNTER)


[grammar] ~32-~32: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ackend via the API gateway results in a timout. The same behaviour occurs when the nam...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/support/known-issues.md (4)

3-3: Grammar: streamline wording for clarity

The phrase “different artifacts and templates we provide” is a bit clunky. A more concise construction improves readability.

-This page informs about known issues or bugs in the different artifacts and templates we provide.
+This page lists known issues and bugs affecting the various artifacts and templates we provide.

5-8: Tighten admonition wording & punctuation

  1. Use present-tense “find” instead of past “found”.
  2. Add comma after “If not” to avoid a run-on sentence.
  3. The admonition header can be shortened; “Info” is implicit.
-::: info Information
-If you found an issue not mentioned here, please head over to our GitHub repositories and check if a corresponding bug ticket exists.
-If not feel free to open a new one.
+::: info
+If you find an issue not mentioned here, please check our GitHub repositories for an existing bug ticket.
+If not, feel free to open a new one.

10-28: Consistent heading capitalisation

Adopt title-case headings throughout for polish and consistency (“API Gateway”, “Integrations”, etc.).

-## API gateway
+## API Gateway
@@
-### refarch-frontend
+### refarch-frontend
@@
-### refarch-webcomponent
+### refarch-webcomponent
@@
-### refarch-backend
+### refarch-backend
@@
-### refarch-eai
+### refarch-eai

(You may decide to capitalise the template names as proper nouns as well, e.g., “RefArch-Frontend”.)


32-36: Minor wording & hyphen fix

Hyphenating “configuration-error” is unnecessary, and “real-case scenario” can be simplified.

-In both cases this is a configuration-error and thus should not occur in a working real-case scenario.
+Both cases are configuration errors and should not occur in a properly configured production environment.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6358f39 and 2d02074.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/.vitepress/config.mts (2 hunks)
  • docs/support/known-issues.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/.vitepress/config.mts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/support/known-issues.md

[style] ~6-~6: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...e provide. ::: info Information If you found an issue not mentioned here, please hea...

(FIND_ENCOUNTER)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-maven

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/support/known-issues.md (3)

3-3: Refine wording for clarity

The phrase “the different artifacts and templates we provide” reads a bit awkwardly. Re-phrasing slightly improves flow.

-This page informs about known issues or bugs in the different artifacts and templates we provide.
+This page lists known issues and bugs affecting the various artifacts and templates that we provide.

5-8: Tighten grammar in the information call-out

A couple of minor language nits: use present-tense “find”, add a comma after “If not”, and replace “head over” with a more neutral verb.

-If you found an issue not mentioned here, please head over to our GitHub repositories and check if a corresponding bug ticket exists.
-If not feel free to open a new one.
+If you find an issue that is not mentioned here, please visit our GitHub repositories and check whether a corresponding bug ticket already exists.
+If not, feel free to open a new one.

18-18: Fix hyphenation and wording

“configuration-error” should not be hyphenated, and “real-case” is uncommon.

-In both cases this is a configuration-error and thus should not occur in a working real-case scenario.
+In both cases, this is a configuration error and therefore should not occur in a correctly configured production scenario.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d02074 and ee51d67.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/support/known-issues.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/support/known-issues.md

[style] ~6-~6: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...e provide. ::: info Information If you found an issue not mentioned here, please hea...

(FIND_ENCOUNTER)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-maven
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/support/known-issues.md (1)

14-16: Verify internal links resolve correctly

Both links (/gateway#security and /cross-cutting-concepts/security#client-validation) rely on section anchors. Please double-check that:

  1. The target markdown files exist at those paths in the built site.
  2. The exact heading IDs match the anchors used here (case-sensitive in VitePress).

Broken anchors will silently drop users at the top of the page.

Copy link
Member

@simonhir simonhir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@devtobi devtobi merged commit 47a1624 into main Jul 25, 2025
15 checks passed
@devtobi devtobi deleted the docs/598-bug-gateway-timeout-on-401 branch July 25, 2025 08:04
@simonhir simonhir mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug The issue is a bug Type: Documentation The issue contains work for the documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Gateway timeout on 401
2 participants