build(tauri): migrate from v1 to v2 #158
Conversation
ivangabriele
added
the
internal
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #158 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.50% 32.29% -3.21%
==========================================
Files 29 33 +4
Lines 783 870 +87
Branches 15 15
==========================================
+ Hits 278 281 +3
- Misses 501 589 +88
+ Partials 4 0 -4
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple files across the project, primarily focusing on improving code readability, updating function signatures, and modifying event emission methods. Key modifications include updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Backend
User->>App: Interacts with UI
App->>Backend: Emit event (using emit)
Backend-->>App: Return response
App->>User: Update UI based on response
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)src-tauri/src/libs/logger.rs (2)
The concerns raised in the previous review about blocking I/O and CSV handling remain valid:
Line range hint Since this is part of a Tauri v2 migration, we should verify that the current logging implementation aligns with Tauri v2's best practices and features. Let's check for any Tauri v2 specific logging implementations or recommendations: ✅ Verification successfulBased on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the Tauri v2 logging compatibility: Custom logging implementation is compatible with Tauri v2 The current logging implementation in
Since this is an application-specific logging implementation that:
The implementation is well-aligned with Tauri v2's architecture and doesn't require any modifications. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for Tauri logging-related imports and implementations
echo "Searching for Tauri logging patterns..."
rg --type rust "tauri::.*log"
echo -e "\nChecking if there are any Tauri v2 migration guides with logging recommendations..."
fd -t f "README|MIGRATION|CHANGELOG" -X grep -i "tauri.*log"
Length of output: 366 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any Tauri logging-related code in a broader context
echo "Searching for any Tauri logging usage..."
rg -t rust "use tauri.*log|tauri::.*log|log::" -A 3
echo -e "\nChecking current Tauri dependencies and features..."
rg -t toml "tauri.*=|log.*=" src-tauri/Cargo.toml
echo -e "\nChecking for any logging-related configurations..."
rg -t rust "LogTarget|log::Level|log::LevelFilter"
echo -e "\nChecking for any logging setup in main or lib..."
fd "main.rs|lib.rs" -t f -X cat
Length of output: 31829 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 34
🧹 Outside diff range comments (20)
src/screens/Dashboard/index.tsx (4)
Line range hint
35-50: Consider implementing error handling for invoke calls.The effect hook makes multiple
invokecalls without error handling. In a desktop application, these calls could fail due to various reasons (IPC issues, daemon problems, etc.).useEffect(() => { - invoke('get_dashboard_state') + invoke('get_dashboard_state').catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to get dashboard state:', error) + setState(prev => ({ ...prev, is_ready: false, status: Core.DashboardStatus.Unknown })) + }) listen<Core.DashboardState>('dashboard:state', event => { setState(event.payload) }) timerRef.current = window.setInterval(() => { - invoke('get_dashboard_state') + invoke('get_dashboard_state').catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to get dashboard state:', error) + setState(prev => ({ ...prev, is_ready: false, status: Core.DashboardStatus.Unknown })) + }) }, 500)
Line range hint
26-33: Add error handling to daemon control functions.The
startDaemonandstopDaemonfunctions should handle potential errors from the invoke calls.const startDaemon = useCallback(() => { - invoke('start_daemon') + invoke('start_daemon').catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to start daemon:', error) + }) }, []) const stopDaemon = useCallback(() => { - invoke('stop_daemon') + invoke('stop_daemon').catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to stop daemon:', error) + }) }, [])
Line range hint
35-50: Consider implementing a more resilient polling mechanism.The current implementation uses a fixed 500ms interval which might be:
- Too frequent for the daemon's response time
- Not adaptive to system load or performance
- Potentially wasteful when the window is not focused
Consider implementing a more sophisticated polling strategy:
useEffect(() => { let mounted = true const INITIAL_INTERVAL = 500 const MAX_INTERVAL = 2000 let currentInterval = INITIAL_INTERVAL async function pollState() { if (!mounted) return try { await invoke('get_dashboard_state') // On success, reset interval currentInterval = INITIAL_INTERVAL } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to get dashboard state:', error) // On error, increase interval up to MAX_INTERVAL currentInterval = Math.min(currentInterval * 1.5, MAX_INTERVAL) } timerRef.current = window.setTimeout(pollState, currentInterval) } // Initial poll pollState() // Cleanup return () => { mounted = false if (timerRef.current) { window.clearTimeout(timerRef.current) } } }, [setState])
Event listener cleanup is missing and inconsistent with other patterns
Looking at the codebase patterns:
- The Loader screen properly stores the unlisten promise in a ref (
unlistenRef) and handles cleanup- Other screens (Settings, Scanner) also use the
listenfunction but lack proper cleanup- The Dashboard screen's event listener cleanup is missing, which could lead to memory leaks
Recommended fix as per the original review:
useEffect(() => { invoke('get_dashboard_state') - listen<Core.DashboardState>('dashboard:state', event => { + const unlistenPromise = listen<Core.DashboardState>('dashboard:state', event => { setState(event.payload) }) timerRef.current = window.setInterval(() => { invoke('get_dashboard_state') }, 500) return () => { if (timerRef.current) { window.clearInterval(timerRef.current) } + unlistenPromise.then(unlisten => unlisten()) } }, [setState])🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
35-50: Verify event listener cleanup.The effect hook sets up an event listener but doesn't clean it up properly.
useEffect(() => { invoke('get_dashboard_state') - listen<Core.DashboardState>('dashboard:state', event => { + const unlistenPromise = listen<Core.DashboardState>('dashboard:state', event => { setState(event.payload) }) timerRef.current = window.setInterval(() => { invoke('get_dashboard_state') }, 500) return () => { if (timerRef.current) { window.clearInterval(timerRef.current) } + unlistenPromise.then(unlisten => unlisten()) } }, [setState])🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are other instances of event listeners that properly clean up rg -A 5 "listen.*event.*payload.*return.*unlisten" .Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for listen patterns in the codebase to understand event handling patterns rg -A 10 "listen.*event.*payload" .Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for unlisten patterns to understand cleanup patterns rg -A 5 "unlisten" .Length of output: 1193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tauri listen patterns specifically ast-grep --pattern 'listen<$_>($_, $_)'Length of output: 1196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for useEffect cleanup patterns with event listeners ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect(() => { $$$ listen$$$ return () => { $$$ } })'Length of output: 90
src-tauri/src/settings/commands.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-93: Consider enhancing error handling with Tauri v2 features.Since you're migrating to Tauri v2, consider leveraging its improved error handling capabilities:
- Use the new
Errortrait implementations for better error propagation- Consider implementing custom error types for settings-specific errors
- Utilize Tauri v2's enhanced error serialization for better frontend error handling
This would improve error handling consistency across the application and provide better error context to users.
src-tauri/src/dashboard/commands.rs (1)
Line range hint
14-71: Consider enhancing error handling and loggingWhile the basic error handling is in place, consider these improvements:
- Replace the generic
Result<(), ()>with specific error types- Add structured logging for WebSocket errors
- Consider adding tracing spans for better debugging
Here's a suggested improvement for the error handling:
-pub async fn get_dashboard_state( +pub async fn get_dashboard_state<'a>( app_handle: AppHandle, shared_state: State<'_, state::DashboardSharedState>, -) -> Result<(), ()> { +) -> Result<(), DashboardError> { use tauri::Emitter; + use tracing::{debug_span, Instrument}; + let span = debug_span!("dashboard_state"); + async move { debug!("Fetching dashboard state"); let url = Uri::from_static("ws://127.0.0.1:7878"); let (ws_stream, _) = connect_async(url) .await .map_err(|e| DashboardError::ConnectionFailed(e.to_string()))?; // ... rest of the function ... + } + .instrument(span) + .await } +#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)] +pub enum DashboardError { + #[error("Failed to connect to daemon: {0}")] + ConnectionFailed(String), + #[error("Failed to receive message: {0}")] + MessageError(String), + #[error("No message received from daemon")] + NoMessage, }src/screens/Settings/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
26-39: Add error handling for Tauri commands.The
updateClamdConfFileSourcefunction should handle potential errors from the Tauri command.Consider updating the implementation:
- invoke('update_clamd_conf_file_source', { - nextSource: clamdConfFileSourceRef.current, - }) + try { + await invoke('update_clamd_conf_file_source', { + nextSource: clamdConfFileSourceRef.current, + }) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to update configuration:', error) + // TODO: Add user notification about the error + return + }
Line range hint
41-51: Consider replacing polling with event-based updates.The
waitForWritingEndfunction uses polling which is less efficient than event-based updates.Consider using Tauri events instead:
// Listen for write completion event listen<void>('settings:write_complete', () => { updateState(prevState => ({ ...prevState, is_writing: false })) })src/screens/Scanner/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
26-29: Consider error handling for invoke calls.The
invokecalls for scanner control and state management should include error handling to gracefully handle potential failures.Consider wrapping the invoke calls in try-catch blocks:
const startScanner = useCallback(() => { - invoke('start_scanner') + try { + await invoke('start_scanner') + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to start scanner:', error) + // Handle error appropriately + } }, [])Also applies to: 38-41
src-tauri/src/settings/utils.rs (2)
Line range hint
106-106: Address TODO comment during migration.The TODO comment about state management should be addressed during this Tauri v2 migration to ensure proper state handling in the new version.
Would you like me to help implement the state management logic or create a GitHub issue to track this?
Line range hint
89-112: Consider refactoring the state update function.The function takes multiple optional parameters which could be simplified using a struct-based approach. This would make the function more maintainable and easier to extend.
Consider this alternative approach:
#[derive(Default)] pub struct SettingsUpdate { pub clamd_conf_file_path: Option<Option<String>>, pub clamd_conf_file_source: Option<Option<String>>, pub is_writing: Option<bool>, } pub async fn update_public_state( app_handle: &AppHandle, update: SettingsUpdate, ) -> () { let mut public_state_mutex_guard = app_handle .state::<state::SharedSettingsState>() .inner() .0 .public .lock() .await; if let Some(path) = update.clamd_conf_file_path { public_state_mutex_guard.clamd_conf_file_path = path; } if let Some(source) = update.clamd_conf_file_source { public_state_mutex_guard.clamd_conf_file_source = source; } public_state_mutex_guard.is_ready = true; if let Some(is_writing) = update.is_writing { public_state_mutex_guard.is_writing = is_writing; } app_handle .emit("settings:state", public_state_mutex_guard.clone()) .expect("Failed to emit `settings:state` event."); }src-tauri/src/cloud/commands.rs (2)
Line range hint
94-106: Add error handling and privilege checkingThe daemon management has several potential improvements needed:
- Add privilege checking before executing systemctl
- Handle and report the command execution status
- Consider using proper error types instead of ignoring the Result
pub fn start_cloud_daemon() -> () { debug!("start_cloud_daemon()", "Command call."); + // Check if running with sufficient privileges + if !utils::has_sudo_access() { + return Err(Error::InsufficientPrivileges); + } + TokioCommand::new("systemctl") .args(["start", "clamav-freshclam"]) .stderr(Stdio::piped()) .stdout(Stdio::piped()) .spawn() - .expect("Failed to run `systemctl stop freshclam`"); + .map_err(|e| Error::DaemonError(e.to_string()))?;
Based on the accumulated evidence from our searches:
Frontend event listeners need to be implemented for
cloud:stateThe migration from
emit_alltoemitin the Rust backend is only half of the required changes. Our searches revealed:
- The backend emits
cloud:stateevents insrc-tauri/src/cloud/commands.rs- Frontend has Tauri event imports (
listen) in multiple components- No existing implementation of
cloud:stateevent listener was found in the frontend- The
CloudStatetype exists in the frontend types but isn't being used with eventsRequired actions:
- Add event listener for
cloud:statein the appropriate frontend component- Implement state updates using the
CloudStatetype fromsrc/core/types.ts🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-31: Verify event listener updates in frontend codeThe migration from
emit_alltoemitis correct for Tauri v2, but this change requires corresponding updates in the frontend event listeners.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for frontend event listeners that might need updates rg -l "cloud:state" --type ts --type vueLength of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for cloud:state event listeners in all files rg -l "cloud:state"Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for actual usage of cloud:state event listeners with context rg "cloud:state" -C 2Length of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all frontend files that might contain event listeners fd -e ts -e js -e jsx -e tsx -e vueLength of output: 2409
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any Tauri event listener patterns in frontend files rg -C 3 "listen|addEventListener.*cloud:state|useEventListener.*cloud:state" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any imports of Tauri event-related functions rg -C 2 "import.*\{.*listen.*\}.*@tauri" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for cloud state management in frontend rg -C 3 "CloudState|CloudPublicState" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any event listeners or cloud state patterns without file type restrictions rg -C 3 "listen.*cloud:state|addEventListener.*cloud:state|useEventListener.*cloud:state|CloudState|CloudPublicState"Length of output: 2244
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Tauri event imports without file type restrictions rg -C 2 "import.*from.*@tauri"Length of output: 1318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any cloud-related state management rg -C 3 "cloud.*state"Length of output: 2515
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for cloud state event listeners in the Dashboard component rg -C 5 "cloud:state" src/screens/Dashboard/Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for cloud state event listeners in the Loader component rg -C 5 "cloud:state" src/screens/Loader/Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any cloud state related code in the frontend components rg -C 5 "CloudState" src/screens/Length of output: 33
src-tauri/src/scanner/utils.rs (1)
Line range hint
108-109: Address TODO comment and improve state managementThe TODO comment "Manage that" lacks clarity, and the
is_readyflag is unconditionally set to true. Consider:
- Documenting the intended behavior
- Implementing proper state management logic
- Adding validation for the ready state
Would you like me to help implement a proper state management solution or create an issue to track this?
src-tauri/cli/src/lib.rs (2)
Line range hint
76-163: Consider improving error handling strategy.The current implementation uses
panic!for error handling, which might not be the best approach for a library. Consider returning aResulttype instead to allow better error handling by the caller.- println!("{:?}", error); - panic!("Bye"); + return Err(CliError::new( + "Failed to spawn command".to_string(), + Box::new(error), + ));
Line range hint
164-178: Consider handling thread join errors gracefully.The
join().unwrap()call could propagate panics from the spawned thread. Consider handling potential join errors gracefully.- join_handle.join().unwrap(); + if let Err(e) = join_handle.join() { + eprintln!("Thread execution failed: {:?}", e); + // Handle the error appropriately + }The thread safety constraints with
Send + 'staticare correctly implemented, ensuring safe concurrent execution.src-tauri/src/scanner/commands.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-190: Consider architectural improvements for event handling.To improve maintainability and reduce duplication:
- Define a constant for the event name
- Create a helper function for event emission with consistent error handling
Consider adding these improvements:
const SCANNER_STATE_EVENT: &str = "scanner:state"; async fn emit_scanner_state<T>(app_handle: &AppHandle, state: &T, context: &str) -> Result<(), ()> where T: serde::Serialize + Clone, { app_handle .emit(SCANNER_STATE_EVENT, state) .map_err(|e| { debug!("{}", format!("{}: Failed to emit state: {}", context, e)); () }) }This would simplify all event emissions to:
emit_scanner_state(&app_handle, &public_state_mutex_guard, "get_scanner_state()").await?;src-tauri/src/copilot/commands.rs (1)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider using integer-based progress calculationThe current implementation uses floating-point division for progress calculation which could lead to precision issues. Consider using integer-based calculation for more predictable results.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- let mut current_checklist_step = 0.0; - let checklist_length = constants::CHECKLIST.len() as f32; + let checklist_length = constants::CHECKLIST.len(); + let mut current_checklist_step = 0; // When updating progress: - let next_checklist_progress = current_checklist_step / checklist_length; + let next_checklist_progress = current_checklist_step as f32 / checklist_length as f32;src-tauri/filer/tests/file_list/list.rs (1)
Security: Documentation needed for EICAR test file
The EICAR test file is present in the e2e test samples and is correctly handled in the lint permissions script, but lacks proper documentation. While the file is appropriately placed in a test directory and recognized as sensitive in
scripts/dev/lint_permissions.js, there's no documentation explaining its purpose and safety considerations.Required actions:
- Add documentation in the repository's README.md or test directory explaining:
- The presence and purpose of the EICAR test file
- That it's a safe, standardized test file
- Its role in the test suite
- Consider adding a README.md in
e2e/samples/directory/with specific details about test files🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-196: Security Note: EICAR test file usage.The test suite includes the EICAR test file (
INFECTED.eicar.com.txt), which is a standard test file for antivirus software. While this is appropriate for testing antivirus functionality, ensure that:
- The repository includes appropriate documentation about the presence of this test file
- CI/CD pipelines are configured to ignore this file in virus scans
Let's verify if there's appropriate documentation about the EICAR test file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation about the EICAR test file echo "Searching for EICAR documentation in README and docs..." rg -i "eicar" --type mdLength of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's do a broader search for EICAR documentation in all text files echo "Searching for EICAR documentation in all text files..." rg -i "eicar" -g "!*.rs" # Let's also check if there's a dedicated test data or fixtures directory echo -e "\nSearching for test data directories..." fd -t d -i "test|fixture|sample" # Let's check the content of any README files in test directories echo -e "\nChecking README files in test directories..." fd -i readme -t fLength of output: 821
src-tauri/filer/tests/file_explorer_test.rs (1)
Line range hint
6-285: Consider organizing tests using nested test modules.The test file contains comprehensive test cases, but as it grows, consider organizing related tests into nested modules using
mod tests { ... }blocks. This would improve test organization and allow for shared setup code.Example structure:
#[cfg(test)] mod tests { mod toggle_is_checked { #[test] fn returns_expected_file_paths_tree() { // Existing test code } } mod toggle_is_expanded { #[test] fn returns_expected_file_paths_tree() { // Existing test code } } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (11)
.github/workflows/analysis.ymlis excluded by!**/*.yml.github/workflows/bundle.ymlis excluded by!**/*.yml.github/workflows/integration.ymlis excluded by!**/*.yml.github/workflows/unit.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymlpackage.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonsrc-tauri/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock,!**/*.locksrc-tauri/Cargo.tomlis excluded by!**/*.tomlsrc-tauri/capabilities/desktop.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonsrc-tauri/capabilities/migrated.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonsrc-tauri/tauri.conf.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
.gitignore(2 hunks)CONTRIBUTING.md(4 hunks)scripts/dev/install_debian_requirements.sh(1 hunks)src-tauri/cli/src/error.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/cli/src/lib.rs(3 hunks)src-tauri/common/src/utils.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/config/src/freshclam.rs(2 hunks)src-tauri/filer/src/file_explorer.rs(4 hunks)src-tauri/filer/src/file_list.rs(3 hunks)src-tauri/filer/tests/file_explorer_test.rs(7 hunks)src-tauri/filer/tests/file_list/list.rs(7 hunks)src-tauri/src/cloud/commands.rs(4 hunks)src-tauri/src/copilot/commands.rs(4 hunks)src-tauri/src/copilot/state.rs(2 hunks)src-tauri/src/dashboard/commands.rs(3 hunks)src-tauri/src/globals.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/src/libs/logger.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/src/main.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/src/modules/tray.rs(0 hunks)src-tauri/src/modules/window.rs(0 hunks)src-tauri/src/scanner/commands.rs(8 hunks)src-tauri/src/scanner/utils.rs(5 hunks)src-tauri/src/settings/commands.rs(3 hunks)src-tauri/src/settings/utils.rs(2 hunks)src-tauri/src/system/tray.rs(1 hunks)src-tauri/src/system/window.rs(1 hunks)src/screens/Dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Loader/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Scanner/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/Settings/index.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src-tauri/src/modules/tray.rs
- src-tauri/src/modules/window.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
CONTRIBUTING.md
75-75: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md
[grammar] ~101-~101: Did you mean “do” or “too”?
Context: ... sh yarn #### 3. Core You will to not only have to build ClamAV Desktop i...
(PRONOUN_MD_TO)
🔇 Additional comments (56)
src-tauri/common/src/utils.rs (1)
6-6: LGTM! Clean formatting improvement.
The formatting change improves readability while preserving the idiomatic Rust implementation and functionality.
src-tauri/src/system/window.rs (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized
The imports provide all necessary types and traits for window management and tray operations.
7-8: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify the purpose of the commented tarpaulin directive
The commented #[cfg(not(tarpaulin_include))] directive suggests this function should be excluded from coverage reports. Please either remove the comment or uncomment it if coverage exclusion is intended.
3-3: Verify global constants existence and usage
Let's verify that the required global constants are properly defined and used consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Global constants are properly defined and consistently used
The verification confirms that:
- Both
MAIN_WINDOW_LABELandMAIN_TRAY_ICON_IDare properly defined inglobals.rs - These constants are consistently used across the codebase:
window.rs: For window management and tray icon operationstray.rs: For tray icon initializationlib.rs: For window access
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the existence and usage of window label and tray icon constants
echo "Checking globals.rs for constants..."
rg "MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL|MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID" src-tauri/src/globals.rs
echo "Checking usage of these constants..."
rg "MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL|MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID" src-tauri/src/
Length of output: 1354
src/screens/Loader/index.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import path updated correctly for Tauri v2.
The import path change from @tauri-apps/api to @tauri-apps/api/core aligns with Tauri v2's new modular structure.
Line range hint 2-46: Verify backend event emission compatibility.
The component's usage of Tauri APIs appears correct for v2. However, since this is a major version upgrade, we should verify that the backend is emitting events using the compatible v2 syntax for the 'copilot:state' event.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the backend is using the correct Tauri v2 event emission syntax. Specifically, in src-tauri/src/copilot/state.rs, we can see:
app_handle
.emit("copilot:state", public_state_mutex_guard.clone())
.unwrap();This matches the expected Tauri v2 event emission pattern using app_handle.emit() with the event name and payload, which is compatible with the frontend's event listening code. Let me generate the final response:
Tauri event handling implementation is compatible with v2
The backend correctly emits the 'copilot:state' event using Tauri v2's app_handle.emit() syntax, which is fully compatible with the frontend's event listening implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for copilot state event emissions in Rust code
# Expect: Events should use Tauri v2's emit syntax
# Look for event emissions in Rust files
rg -t rust "emit|copilot.*state" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 7314
src/screens/Dashboard/index.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import path update aligns with Tauri v2 requirements.
The change from @tauri-apps/api to @tauri-apps/api/core for the invoke import follows Tauri v2's modular import structure.
src-tauri/src/system/tray.rs (2)
1-10: LGTM: Well-organized imports with clear separation of concerns
The imports are properly structured, using specific paths rather than glob imports, which improves code clarity and maintainability.
1-54: Verify Tauri v2 compatibility
Since this is part of a Tauri v1 to v2 migration, please verify:
- The tray icon API usage matches Tauri v2 specifications
- The event handling patterns follow Tauri v2 best practices
- The menu API usage is compatible with Tauri v2
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the tray implementation to verify compatibility with Tauri v2.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final verification response.
Tray implementation is compatible with Tauri v2
The implementation correctly follows Tauri v2 specifications:
- Using correct Tauri v2 dependencies (v2.0.6)
- Proper tray configuration in
tauri.conf.jsonwithtrayIconsettings - Correct usage of TrayIconBuilder API with event handlers
- Appropriate menu implementation using the new Menu API
The code demonstrates best practices:
- Proper error handling with
Result - Clean separation of menu creation logic
- Correct event handling patterns for both menu and tray icon events
- Proper window management through the AppHandle
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Tauri v2 tray-related breaking changes in the codebase
rg -l "tray|TrayIcon"
# Look for any Tauri version specifications in cargo files
rg "tauri.*=" -g "Cargo.*"
Length of output: 857
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check tauri.conf.json for tray-related configurations
cat src-tauri/tauri.conf.json
# Look for any tray-related imports or usage patterns
rg "use tauri::.*tray" -A 5
# Search for tray event handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'on_tray_icon_event($$$)'
Length of output: 2386
scripts/dev/install_debian_requirements.sh (2)
46-46: LGTM: URL updated to Tauri v2 documentation.
The URL correctly points to the official Tauri v2 prerequisites documentation.
48-56: LGTM: Package dependencies updated for Tauri v2.
The package list has been correctly updated with:
- Upgraded to
libwebkit2gtk-4.1-devas required by Tauri v2 - Added
libxdo-devfor window management support - Properly organized package list
Let's verify package availability across supported OS versions:
✅ Verification successful
Package dependencies are correctly aligned with Tauri v2 requirements
The changes in install_debian_requirements.sh are verified to be correct based on:
- The CONTRIBUTING.md explicitly links to Tauri v2 Prerequisites
- The package list follows the standard Debian/Ubuntu installation pattern
- The changes (libwebkit2gtk-4.1-dev upgrade and libxdo-dev addition) align with Tauri v2's system requirements
While we couldn't directly verify package availability in the sandbox environment, the packages are part of the official Tauri v2 requirements which ensures they are available in supported OS versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new packages are available in the supported OS repositories
# Expected: All packages should be available in Debian 12+ and Ubuntu 22.04+
# Test: Check package availability in Ubuntu 22.04
rg -A 5 "libwebkit2gtk-4\.1-dev|libxdo-dev" /etc/apt/sources.list
# Test: Check if packages are installable
apt-cache policy libwebkit2gtk-4.1-dev libxdo-dev
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the package requirements by checking Tauri's official documentation and repository
# Search for package requirements in markdown files
rg -i "system\s+requirements|dependencies|prerequisites" --type md -A 10 -B 10
# Search for Debian/Ubuntu package lists in the codebase
rg -i "apt(-get)?\s+install"
# Check if there are any OS version requirements or constraints
rg -i "debian|ubuntu" --type md
Length of output: 3911
src-tauri/src/settings/commands.rs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import changes align with Tauri v2.
The updated import statement correctly uses the new Tauri v2 API structure.
40-40: LGTM: Simplified error logging without loss of information.
The error logging has been streamlined to a single line while maintaining the same level of detail and proper path interpolation.
19-19: Verify frontend event handling for settings:state event.
The change from emit_all to emit is part of Tauri v2's API changes. Ensure that the frontend is properly listening to the settings:state event with the new event emission method.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed due to file type restrictions. Let's try a broader search to find any references to the event and general event handling patterns in the codebase.
Frontend event handling for settings:state event is properly implemented
The frontend is correctly using Tauri's v2 event handling approach. In src/screens/Settings/index.tsx, the event is properly handled using the listen function from @tauri-apps/api/event:
listen<Core.SettingsState>('settings:state', event => {
setState(event.payload)
clamdConfFileSourceRef.current = event.payload.clamd_conf_file_source
})🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check frontend event listeners for settings:state
# Expected: Frontend code should use addEventListener or similar for 'settings:state'
# Search for settings:state event listeners in frontend code
rg -A 5 "settings:state" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx
Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for settings:state event listeners in frontend code without file type restrictions
rg -A 5 "settings:state"
# Also search for any event listeners or subscriptions in general
rg -A 5 "listen|subscribe|addEventListener"
Length of output: 5590
src-tauri/src/libs/logger.rs (1)
27-27: LGTM! The consolidation improves readability.
The simplified writeln! macro call maintains the same functionality while being more concise.
src-tauri/src/dashboard/commands.rs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Correct import for Tauri v2 migration
The addition of the Emitter trait import is the correct approach for using the new emission methods in Tauri v2.
Also applies to: 20-21
Line range hint 14-14: Verify test coverage configuration
The commands are marked with #[cfg(not(tarpaulin_include))]. Given the significant drop in coverage mentioned in the PR comments (from 35.50% to 20.68%), we should verify if these exclusions are still necessary with Tauri v2.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage configuration across the codebase
# Look for tarpaulin configuration
echo "Checking for tarpaulin configuration..."
fd "tarpaulin" --type f
# Check for other test coverage exclusions
echo "Checking for coverage exclusions..."
rg "not.*tarpaulin_include" --type rustAlso applies to: 77-77, 91-91
58-58: Verify event handling behavior after migration
The change from emit_all to emit is correct for Tauri v2, but we should verify that all event listeners are properly updated to handle this change.
src/screens/Settings/index.tsx (3)
Line range hint 13-24: LGTM! Clean state management implementation.
The component uses appropriate React patterns:
- Ref for tracking changes without re-renders
- Custom hook for cached state
- Clear separation of concerns
Line range hint 67-116: LGTM! Well-structured UI implementation.
The UI implementation:
- Uses appropriate styling patterns
- Maintains accessibility during state changes
- Has clean and organized styled-components usage
1-1: LGTM! Import path updated for Tauri v2.
The import path change from @tauri-apps/api to @tauri-apps/api/core aligns with Tauri v2's modular structure.
Let's verify if all Tauri imports have been updated correctly:
✅ Verification successful
✅ All Tauri imports are correctly updated to V2 format
All imports from @tauri-apps/api across the codebase are using the correct modular format required by Tauri v2:
invokeis consistently imported from@tauri-apps/api/corelistenis consistently imported from@tauri-apps/api/event
No old-style imports (@tauri-apps/api) were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old-style Tauri imports
# Expect: No matches for direct imports from @tauri-apps/api
rg "from '@tauri-apps/api'" --type ts --type tsx
rg 'from "@tauri-apps/api"' --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type filters since tsx is not recognized
# Search for any imports from @tauri-apps/api
rg "from ['\"]@tauri-apps/api['\"]"
# Also search for require statements just to be thorough
rg "require\(['\"]@tauri-apps/api['\"]"
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any Tauri imports, using a more general pattern
rg "@tauri-apps/api" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts
# Also check for any files with .ts or .tsx extension that might contain Tauri imports
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$" -x cat {} \; | grep -i "@tauri-apps/api"
Length of output: 1140
src/screens/Scanner/index.tsx (3)
Line range hint 43-95: LGTM: UI implementation is clean and well-structured.
The UI implementation with styled components and conditional rendering based on scanner state is well-organized and maintainable.
2-2: Verify event listener compatibility with Tauri v2.
The event listening implementation needs verification for Tauri v2 compatibility, particularly the event naming pattern 'scanner:state' and 'scanner:status'.
Let's check the event naming patterns across the codebase:
Also applies to: 31-37
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Tauri version and event handling implementation to make a more informed decision.
Event listener implementation is compatible with Tauri v2
The codebase is already using Tauri v2 (@tauri-apps/api v2.0.3) and follows a consistent event naming pattern (module:state/module:status) throughout both the frontend and Rust backend. The event listeners in the Scanner component match the event names emitted from the Rust code (scanner:state and scanner:status).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify event listener patterns for Tauri v2 compatibility
# Test: Search for event listener usage patterns. Expect: Consistent event naming
echo "Checking event listener usage patterns..."
rg "listen[^a-zA-Z].*['|\"].*:.*['|\"]" -A 2
echo "Checking event emission patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'invoke($_, $_)'
Length of output: 1830
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Tauri dependencies and configuration
echo "Checking Tauri dependencies..."
cat package.json | grep "@tauri"
echo "\nChecking Tauri configuration..."
fd "tauri.conf" --exec cat {}
echo "\nChecking Rust event handlers..."
rg "emit|EventHandler" --type rust
Length of output: 4711
1-1: Verify other Tauri imports for v2 compatibility.
The import change from @tauri-apps/api to @tauri-apps/api/core aligns with Tauri v2's modular API structure.
Let's verify if other Tauri imports in the codebase follow the new pattern:
✅ Verification successful
All Tauri imports follow v2's modular pattern
All files consistently use the new modular import pattern from Tauri v2:
@tauri-apps/api/coreforinvoke@tauri-apps/api/eventforlisten
No old-style imports (@tauri-apps/api) were found in the codebase. The migration appears to be complete and consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old-style Tauri imports that need updating
# Test: Search for direct imports from @tauri-apps/api. Expect: No direct imports without subpath
echo "Checking for old-style Tauri imports..."
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api['|\"]" -l
echo "Checking current Tauri import patterns..."
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api/" -l
Length of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific Tauri imports in each file to ensure they follow v2 pattern
echo "=== Checking Tauri imports in Settings ==="
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api/" src/screens/Settings/index.tsx -A 1
echo -e "\n=== Checking Tauri imports in Dashboard ==="
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api/" src/screens/Dashboard/index.tsx -A 1
echo -e "\n=== Checking Tauri imports in Scanner ==="
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api/" src/screens/Scanner/index.tsx -A 1
echo -e "\n=== Checking Tauri imports in Loader ==="
rg "from ['|\"]@tauri-apps/api/" src/screens/Loader/index.tsx -A 1
Length of output: 1279
src-tauri/src/settings/utils.rs (2)
110-111: Event emission change looks good, verify listeners.
The migration from emit_all to emit is correct for Tauri v2. The error handling is appropriate for this critical state update.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that there is a matching event listener in src/screens/Settings/index.tsx that correctly uses the settings:state event name with the Tauri listen API. The listener properly handles the event payload by updating the state. This verifies that the event emission change in the Rust code is compatible with the frontend listener implementation.
Event emission and listener are properly aligned
The settings:state event emitted from Rust is correctly received by a matching listener in the frontend component at src/screens/Settings/index.tsx, confirming the event communication is properly maintained after the Tauri v2 migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for event listeners to ensure they match the new emission pattern
rg --type-add 'frontend:*.{ts,js,tsx,jsx}' --type frontend 'settings:state' -C 3
Length of output: 519
2-2: Verify if the Emitter import is necessary.
The Emitter trait is imported but doesn't appear to be explicitly used in the code. This might be an artifact from the Tauri v1 to v2 migration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the Emitter trait is actually used in the settings/utils.rs file.
The Emitter import is correctly used and necessary
The Emitter trait is required as it provides the emit method used in the code to send the "settings:state" event. This is a valid usage pattern in Tauri v2, where the Emitter trait needs to be in scope for event emission functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of Emitter in the codebase
rg --type rust "Emitter" -C 3
Length of output: 2284
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of emit or Emitter in settings/utils.rs
rg --type rust "emit|Emitter" src-tauri/src/settings/utils.rs -C 5
Length of output: 452
.gitignore (2)
204-204: LGTM! Proper EOF newline.
The formatting fix ensures proper EOF newline for the storybook log entry.
161-166: LGTM! Verify completeness of Tauri v2 ignore patterns.
The addition of the Tauri section with schema files ignore pattern is appropriate for Tauri v2's capabilities system.
Let's verify if we need any additional Tauri v2 specific patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about Tauri v2's build artifacts and generated files.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
The Tauri ignore patterns are complete and appropriate
The current .gitignore entry for Tauri is sufficient as:
- The
/src-tauri/gen/schemaspattern covers the capabilities schema files - Other build artifacts are already covered by existing patterns:
- Rust build outputs are handled by the standard
/targetignore pattern - Frontend dist files are configured to
../distwhich is already ignored
- Rust build outputs are handled by the standard
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any Tauri v2 specific files/directories that might need to be ignored
# Test 1: Look for any .rs files that might mention additional generated paths
rg -g "*.rs" "tauri::generate|tauri::Builder" src-tauri/
# Test 2: Check if there are any untracked files in src-tauri that might need ignoring
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard src-tauri/
Length of output: 301
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Tauri's documentation files and configs for any hints about generated files
rg -g "*.{json,toml}" "generated|dist|build|out" src-tauri/
# Look for any build-related patterns in Cargo.toml
cat src-tauri/Cargo.toml
# Check for any existing build artifacts or generated files
fd . src-tauri/target || true
fd . src-tauri/gen || true
Length of output: 2843
src-tauri/src/cloud/commands.rs (3)
1-8: LGTM: Imports are properly updated for Tauri v2
The imports correctly reflect the migration to Tauri v2, particularly the use of tauri_plugin_shell for process management and the addition of Emitter for event handling.
Line range hint 45-51: LGTM: Proper sidecar implementation for Tauri v2
The migration to shell().sidecar() is correctly implemented with proper error handling.
Line range hint 109-121: Fix error message and apply same improvements as start_cloud_daemon
The error message in .expect() is incorrect (mentions "stop" while starting the service). Also, this function needs the same improvements as suggested for start_cloud_daemon.
src-tauri/src/scanner/utils.rs (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import changes align with Tauri v2 migration
The addition of Emitter trait is consistent with Tauri v2's event system changes.
74-75: Verify event listener compatibility with Tauri v2
The migration from emit_all to emit is correct for Tauri v2. However, we should verify that all corresponding event listeners have been updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 88-89, 115-116, 133-134
✅ Verification successful
Event listeners are correctly implemented for Tauri v2 migration
The event listeners in src/screens/Scanner/index.tsx are using the correct listen API which is compatible with Tauri v2's event system. The listeners properly handle both scanner:state and scanner:status events that are being emitted from the Rust code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for event listeners in the frontend code
rg -A 5 "scanner:(status|state)" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for event listeners in the frontend code with correct file extensions
rg -A 5 "scanner:(status|state)" --type typescript --type javascriptreact --type typescriptreact
# Also try searching without file type restrictions as the frontend might use different extensions
rg -A 5 "scanner:(status|state)" "src"
Length of output: 747
src-tauri/cli/src/lib.rs (2)
124-124: LGTM! Debug output formatting improved.
The debug output formatting has been enhanced with underline for better visibility of the line content while keeping the metadata (DEBUG and cli::run()) in cyan.
Line range hint 76-178: Verify Tauri v2 compatibility for CLI module.
While the changes appear syntactically correct, let's verify if any Tauri v2-specific changes are needed for the CLI module.
src-tauri/src/scanner/commands.rs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import change aligns with Tauri v2 migration.
The addition of the Emitter trait import is necessary for the new event emission pattern.
32-34: LGTM: Improved code readability.
The method chain consolidation makes the code more concise while maintaining clarity.
50-50: LGTM: Well-structured scanner initialization sequence.
The changes improve code organization and logging while maintaining a clear progression of scanner states:
- Tree access
- Status updates
- File listing
- Progress tracking
Also applies to: 53-53, 56-57, 70-70, 78-80
src-tauri/filer/src/file_explorer.rs (4)
69-69: LGTM: Proper ownership handling
The code correctly uses to_owned() to create an owned version of the index path for the node replacement operation.
186-186: LGTM: Consistent with check_node implementation
The implementation maintains consistency with the check_node method and correctly handles ownership.
77-90:
Add error handling for file system operations
The file listing operation could fail for various reasons (permissions, I/O errors). Consider adding proper error handling.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- let next_children = file_list::list(false, directory_absolute_path_option, Some(types::FileKind::Directory))
- .into_file_explorer()
- .into_tree()
+ let next_children = match file_list::list(false, directory_absolute_path_option, Some(types::FileKind::Directory)) {
+ Ok(list) => list.into_file_explorer().into_tree(),
+ Err(e) => {
+ log::error!("Failed to list directory contents: {}", e);
+ vec![]
+ }
+ }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
76-77: Consider platform-specific path handling
The path normalization should be tested across different platforms (Windows, Linux, macOS) to ensure consistent behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the normalize_path implementation to ensure it handles platform-specific paths correctly.
Let me try a different approach to check the implementation.
Path handling implementation is adequate for basic use cases
The normalize_path function correctly handles platform-specific path separators by:
- Normalizing double slashes (
//) to single slash - Converting forward slashes to backslashes on Windows
- Preserving forward slashes on Unix-like systems
The implementation is tested with platform-specific assertions, making it reliable for the current usage in expand_node.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for platform-specific path handling
rg -g '*.rs' -A 3 'normalize_path|join|to_string_lossy'
Length of output: 4291
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check normalize_path implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn normalize_path$$$'
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the normalize_path implementation and its tests
rg -g '*.rs' -A 10 'fn normalize_path'
Length of output: 1388
src-tauri/filer/src/file_list.rs (2)
184-184: LGTM!
The function signature reformatting improves readability while maintaining the same functionality.
35-35: Verify depth calculation safety.
The depth calculation assumes path_components is non-empty. Consider adding a guard clause to handle empty paths gracefully.
✅ Verification successful
Depth calculation is safe, no changes needed
The depth calculation path_components.len() - 1 is safe because:
pathbufsis populated either from drive listing or directory paths- Path components are extracted from valid PathBuf objects using
components() - Even in edge cases (root paths), there will always be at least one component
- The filter_map closure will safely handle any conversion failures through Option
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for empty path handling in tests
rg -A 5 "FileList::new\(vec!\[\]\)" || rg -A 5 "FileList::new\(Vec::new\(\)\)"
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the FileList constructor and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'impl FileList {
$$$
pub fn new($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Also check how path_components is obtained
rg -B 5 "path_components" src-tauri/filer/src/file_list.rs
Length of output: 1149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how pathbufs is populated in FileList
ast-grep --pattern 'struct FileList {
$$$
}'
# And check where pathbufs is set/modified
rg -A 5 "pathbufs" src-tauri/filer/src/file_list.rs
Length of output: 1861
src-tauri/src/copilot/commands.rs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports correctly updated for Tauri v2
The imports have been properly updated to use Tauri v2's new module structure and the required ShellExt trait for shell operations.
Line range hint 36-46: LGTM: Consistent error handling for sidecar checks
The implementation maintains consistent error handling patterns across both sidecar checks (clamscan and freshclam).
Also applies to: 57-67
Line range hint 99-111: LGTM: Proper implementation of sidecar checks for Tauri v2
The new implementation correctly uses Tauri v2's shell API for sidecar management with proper error handling.
Let's verify if all sidecar usages have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the actual usage of Command in these files to determine if they need updating.
No issues found with sidecar implementation
The search results show that all instances of Command::new are used for different purposes (system commands, find operations) and not for sidecar management. The only sidecar usage is in src-tauri/src/copilot/commands.rs which correctly uses the new Tauri v2 pattern shell().sidecar(). The old sidecar implementation has been properly updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining old sidecar implementations
rg -l "Command::new|Command::sidecar" --type rust
# Search for current sidecar usage pattern
rg -l "shell\(\)\.sidecar" --type rust
Length of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual Command usage context
rg "Command::new|Command::sidecar" -A 5 -B 2 --type rust
Length of output: 8125
src-tauri/filer/tests/file_list/list.rs (2)
10-12: LGTM: Clean function call formatting.
The consolidation of the function call improves code consistency while maintaining readability.
41-42: LGTM: Consistent function call formatting across test cases.
The changes maintain a uniform style throughout the test file, improving code consistency and readability.
Also applies to: 66-67, 106-107, 126-127, 148-149, 170-171
src-tauri/config/src/freshclam.rs (2)
135-143: LGTM! Clean and well-structured code.
The implementation for handling ExtraDatabase entries is thread-safe and properly maintains the list of optional signature databases. The improved indentation enhances code readability.
189-189: LGTM! Consistent formatting.
The formatting change maintains consistency with the rest of the codebase.
CONTRIBUTING.md (4)
142-145: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding Tauri v2 specific test commands
The test commands should be reviewed to ensure they're compatible with Tauri v2's testing infrastructure. Consider adding any new test commands that are specific to v2.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if package.json contains updated test scripts for Tauri v2
rg '"test:' package.jsonWould you like me to help update the test commands to align with Tauri v2's best practices?
152-154: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Update development commands for Tauri v2
The development commands should be reviewed to ensure they align with Tauri v2's development workflow. Consider adding any new commands or flags that are specific to v2.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if package.json contains updated dev scripts for Tauri v2
rg '"dev:' package.jsonWould you like me to help update the development commands to align with Tauri v2's best practices?
58-63:
Update Node.js version requirement
The specified Node.js v22 requirement seems unusually high, as it's currently in pre-release status. Consider using a more stable LTS version that's compatible with Tauri v2.
✅ Verification successful
Node.js v22 requirement is correctly specified
The Node.js v22 requirement in CONTRIBUTING.md is accurate and consistent with the project's configuration. The package.json explicitly specifies "node": "22" in its engines field, and this version requirement is consistently documented across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if package.json specifies a different Node.js version
rg '"node":' package.json
Length of output: 702
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for engine requirements and dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.engines, .dependencies'
# Check for any Node.js version mentions in other configuration files
rg -i 'node.*v\d+' .
Length of output: 1191
137-138: Verify Tauri v2 WebDriver documentation links
The WebDriver documentation links should be verified to ensure they point to the correct Tauri v2 documentation pages, as these might have changed during the v1 to v2 migration.
src-tauri/filer/tests/file_explorer_test.rs (1)
11-13: LGTM: Clean formatting of function initialization.
The multi-line formatting improves readability while maintaining proper Rust style conventions.
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message); | ||
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving error message readability.
The current implementation uses debug formatting ({:?}) for both the message and error box, which might not be the most user-friendly format. Consider using Display formatting for the message and providing more structured error details.
- println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message);
- println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error);
+ eprintln!("{} {} {}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message);
+ eprintln!("{} {} {}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[DETAILS]".purple(), error);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message); | |
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error); | |
| eprintln!("{} {} {}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message); | |
| eprintln!("{} {} {}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[DETAILS]".purple(), error); |
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using eprintln! for error messages.
While the formatting changes look good, error messages should typically be written to stderr instead of stdout.
- println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message);
- println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error);
+ eprintln!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message);
+ eprintln!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message); | |
| println!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error); | |
| eprintln!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[MESSAGE]".red(), message); | |
| eprintln!("{} {} {:?}", "[ERROR]".bold().red(), "[BOX]".purple(), error); |
| pub const MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL: &str = "main"; | ||
| pub const MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID: &str = "MAIN_TRAY_ICON"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add documentation comments for the new constants.
The constants look good and follow Rust naming conventions. Consider adding documentation comments to explain their purpose and usage in the Tauri v2 context.
Apply this diff to add documentation:
+/// Label identifier for the main application window.
+/// Used in window management operations like show/hide.
pub const MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL: &str = "main";
+/// Identifier for the main system tray icon.
+/// Used in tray menu operations and icon management.
pub const MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID: &str = "MAIN_TRAY_ICON";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub const MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL: &str = "main"; | |
| pub const MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID: &str = "MAIN_TRAY_ICON"; | |
| /// Label identifier for the main application window. | |
| /// Used in window management operations like show/hide. | |
| pub const MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL: &str = "main"; | |
| /// Identifier for the main system tray icon. | |
| /// Used in tray menu operations and icon management. | |
| pub const MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID: &str = "MAIN_TRAY_ICON"; |
| // #[cfg(not(tarpaulin_include))] | ||
| pub fn show<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () { | ||
| let window = app_handle | ||
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | ||
| .expect("Could not get window."); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = window.show(); | ||
| let _ = window.set_focus(); | ||
|
|
||
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | ||
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, false); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu)); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Apply similar improvements to show function
This function has the same improvement opportunities as the hide function.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+/// Shows and focuses the main application window and updates the tray menu accordingly.
+///
+/// # Arguments
+/// * `app_handle` - The Tauri application handle
+///
+/// # Returns
+/// `Result<(), Error>` - Success or error during window/tray operations
-pub fn show<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () {
+pub fn show<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> tauri::Result<()> {
let window = app_handle
.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL)
- .expect("Could not get window.");
+ .ok_or_else(|| tauri::Error::WindowNotFound)?;
- let _ = window.show();
- let _ = window.set_focus();
+ window.show()?;
+ window.set_focus()?;
if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) {
let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, false);
- let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu));
+ tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu))?;
}
+ Ok(())
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // #[cfg(not(tarpaulin_include))] | |
| pub fn show<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () { | |
| let window = app_handle | |
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | |
| .expect("Could not get window."); | |
| let _ = window.show(); | |
| let _ = window.set_focus(); | |
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | |
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, false); | |
| let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Shows and focuses the main application window and updates the tray menu accordingly. | |
| /// | |
| /// # Arguments | |
| /// * `app_handle` - The Tauri application handle | |
| /// | |
| /// # Returns | |
| /// `Result<(), Error>` - Success or error during window/tray operations | |
| pub fn show<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> tauri::Result<()> { | |
| let window = app_handle | |
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | |
| .ok_or_else(|| tauri::Error::WindowNotFound)?; | |
| window.show()?; | |
| window.set_focus()?; | |
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | |
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, false); | |
| tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu))?; | |
| } | |
| Ok(()) | |
| } |
| pub fn hide<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () { | ||
| let window = app_handle | ||
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | ||
| .expect("Could not get window."); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = window.hide(); | ||
|
|
||
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | ||
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, true); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu)); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and add documentation
Several improvements are recommended for this public function:
- Add documentation explaining the function's purpose and behavior
- Replace
expect()with proper error handling - Consider logging errors instead of silently ignoring them with
let _
Here's a suggested implementation:
+/// Hides the main application window and updates the tray menu accordingly.
+///
+/// # Arguments
+/// * `app_handle` - The Tauri application handle
+///
+/// # Returns
+/// `Result<(), Error>` - Success or error during window/tray operations
-pub fn hide<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () {
+pub fn hide<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> tauri::Result<()> {
let window = app_handle
.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL)
- .expect("Could not get window.");
+ .ok_or_else(|| tauri::Error::WindowNotFound)?;
- let _ = window.hide();
+ window.hide()?;
if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) {
let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, true);
- let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu));
+ tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu))?;
}
+ Ok(())
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub fn hide<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> () { | |
| let window = app_handle | |
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | |
| .expect("Could not get window."); | |
| let _ = window.hide(); | |
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | |
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, true); | |
| let _ = tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Hides the main application window and updates the tray menu accordingly. | |
| /// | |
| /// # Arguments | |
| /// * `app_handle` - The Tauri application handle | |
| /// | |
| /// # Returns | |
| /// `Result<(), Error>` - Success or error during window/tray operations | |
| pub fn hide<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> tauri::Result<()> { | |
| let window = app_handle | |
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | |
| .ok_or_else(|| tauri::Error::WindowNotFound)?; | |
| window.hide()?; | |
| if let Some(tray_icon) = app_handle.tray_by_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) { | |
| let next_menu = tray::new_menu(app_handle, true); | |
| tray_icon.set_menu(Some(next_menu))?; | |
| } | |
| Ok(()) | |
| } |
| import { useCallback, useEffect, useRef } from 'react' | ||
| // import { toast } from 'react-hot-toast' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clean up commented code.
The commented toast import suggests incomplete error handling implementation or cleanup.
Either:
- Remove the commented import if it's no longer needed
- Implement proper error handling using toast notifications if that was the original intent
| // let app_cache_dir = api::path::app_cache_dir(config).expect("Could not get cache directory."); | ||
| // println!("Cache directory: {:?}", app_cache_dir); | ||
| // let app_config_dir = api::path::app_config_dir(config).expect("Could not get config directory."); | ||
| // println!("Config directory: {:?}", app_config_dir); | ||
| // let app_data_dir = api::path::app_data_dir(config).expect("Could not get data directory."); | ||
| // println!("Data directory: {:?}", app_data_dir); | ||
| // let app_local_data_dir = | ||
| // api::path::app_local_data_dir(config).expect("Could not get local data directory."); | ||
| // println!("Local data directory: {:?}", app_local_data_dir); | ||
| // let app_log_dir = api::path::app_log_dir(config).expect("Could not get log directory."); | ||
| // println!("Log directory: {:?}", app_log_dir); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove commented-out code to improve readability
The code from lines 79 to 90 is commented out and may clutter the file. Removing unused code enhances maintainability.
Consider deleting these lines if they're no longer needed.
| tauri::async_runtime::block_on(async move { | ||
| #[cfg(all(desktop))] | ||
| { | ||
| system::tray::new_tray_icon(app_handle).expect("Could not create system tray."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential errors when creating the system tray
Using expect may cause a panic if the system tray cannot be created. Consider handling the error gracefully to improve the application's robustness.
Apply this change to handle the error:
- system::tray::new_tray_icon(app_handle).expect("Could not create system tray.");
+ if let Err(e) = system::tray::new_tray_icon(app_handle) {
+ eprintln!("Warning: Could not create system tray: {:?}", e);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| system::tray::new_tray_icon(app_handle).expect("Could not create system tray."); | |
| if let Err(e) = system::tray::new_tray_icon(app_handle) { | |
| eprintln!("Warning: Could not create system tray: {:?}", e); | |
| } |
| }) | ||
| .expect("Could not set window size."); | ||
| window.set_always_on_top(false).expect("Could not set always on top."); | ||
| window.webviews().first().unwrap().open_devtools(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using unwrap() to prevent potential panics
Calling unwrap() on window.webviews().first() can cause a panic if no webviews are available. Handle the Option safely to enhance stability.
Apply this change to handle the Option:
- window.webviews().first().unwrap().open_devtools();
+ if let Some(webview) = window.webviews().first() {
+ webview.open_devtools();
+ } else {
+ eprintln!("Warning: No webviews available to open DevTools.");
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| window.webviews().first().unwrap().open_devtools(); | |
| if let Some(webview) = window.webviews().first() { | |
| webview.open_devtools(); | |
| } else { | |
| eprintln!("Warning: No webviews available to open DevTools."); | |
| } |
| let window = app_handle.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).expect( | ||
| format!("Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).as_str(), | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify expect by removing unnecessary .as_str()
The .as_str() method is unnecessary because expect accepts a &str or a String. Removing it simplifies the code.
Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- let window = app_handle.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).expect(
- format!("Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).as_str(),
- );
+ let window = app_handle.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).expect(&format!(
+ "Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL
+ ));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let window = app_handle.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).expect( | |
| format!("Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).as_str(), | |
| ); | |
| let window = app_handle.get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).expect(&format!( | |
| "Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL | |
| )); |
| tauri::RunEvent::WindowEvent { | ||
| event: window_event, .. | ||
| } => match window_event { | ||
| tauri::WindowEvent::CloseRequested { api, .. } => { | ||
| api.prevent_close(); | ||
|
|
||
| system::window::hide(app_handle); | ||
| } | ||
| _ => {} | ||
| }, | ||
| _ => {} | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling other RunEvent variants
Currently, only WindowEvent::CloseRequested is explicitly handled. Handling other RunEvent variants or logging unhandled events can aid in debugging.
You might add logging for unhandled events:
_ => {}
+ _ => {
+ println!("Unhandled run event: {:?}", run_event);
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src-tauri/src/system/tray.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src-tauri/src/system/tray.rs (2)
1-10: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured, separating external Tauri dependencies from internal modules.
35-35: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Simplify the expect message construction.
The format! call inside expect() is unnecessary as expect() already accepts a string literal.
- .expect(format!("Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).as_str());
+ .expect("Could not get window with label");Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| pub fn new_tray_icon<R: Runtime>(app_handle: &AppHandle<R>) -> tauri::Result<()> { | ||
| let menu = new_menu(app_handle, false); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = TrayIconBuilder::with_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) | ||
| .icon(app_handle.default_window_icon().unwrap().clone()) | ||
| .menu(&menu) | ||
| .menu_on_left_click(false) | ||
| .on_menu_event(move |app_handle, event| match event.id.as_ref() { | ||
| "show" => window::show(app_handle), | ||
| "hide" => window::hide(app_handle), | ||
| "quit" => app_handle.exit(0), | ||
| _ => {} | ||
| }) | ||
| .on_tray_icon_event(|tray, event| { | ||
| if let TrayIconEvent::Click { | ||
| button: MouseButton::Left, | ||
| button_state: MouseButtonState::Up, | ||
| .. | ||
| } = event | ||
| { | ||
| let window = tray | ||
| .app_handle() | ||
| .get_window(globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL) | ||
| .expect(format!("Could not get window with label `{}`.", globals::MAIN_WINDOW_LABEL).as_str()); | ||
|
|
||
| let _ = window.show(); | ||
| let _ = window.set_focus(); | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| .build(app_handle); | ||
|
|
||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider implementing a more robust state management system.
The current implementation manages window visibility state through a boolean parameter. Consider implementing a dedicated state management system that could:
- Track multiple window states
- Handle state transitions more robustly
- Provide better error recovery mechanisms
- Enable easier testing
This would improve maintainability and make the system more scalable for future features.
Also applies to: 46-54
| let _ = TrayIconBuilder::with_id(globals::MAIN_TRAY_ICON_ID) | ||
| .icon(app_handle.default_window_icon().unwrap().clone()) | ||
| .menu(&menu) | ||
| .menu_on_left_click(false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Document the menu_on_left_click setting.
The purpose of setting menu_on_left_click(false) should be documented to explain why left-click behavior is being disabled for the menu.
+ // Disable menu on left click since we handle it separately to show/focus the window
.menu_on_left_click(false)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .menu_on_left_click(false) | |
| // Disable menu on left click since we handle it separately to show/focus the window | |
| .menu_on_left_click(false) |
Description
Upgrade to Tauri to new v2 stable.
Checklist