-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
fix: root view background color setup #900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the assignment and implementation of the internal method Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (1)
49-53
: Consider aligning interface with implementation for type consistency.The wrapper implementation correctly processes the color string using
processColor
and provides a sensible fallback value of0
. However, there's a type inconsistency to address:
- The interface (line 26) declares
_setRootViewBackgroundColor(color?: Color): void
(optional Color)- The implementation always passes a
number
(neverundefined
)Consider updating the interface to reflect the actual usage:
-_setRootViewBackgroundColor(color?: Color): void +_setRootViewBackgroundColor(color: number): voidThis would better represent that the private method always receives a processed numeric color value.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (5)
cxx/hybridObjects/HybridUnistylesRuntime.h (2)
HybridUnistylesRuntime
(16-17)color
(68-68)nitrogen/generated/shared/c++/HybridUnistylesRuntimeSpec.hpp (1)
color
(84-84)nitrogen/generated/android/c++/JHybridNativePlatformSpec.hpp (1)
color
(64-64)nitrogen/generated/shared/c++/HybridNativePlatformSpec.hpp (1)
color
(80-80)nitrogen/generated/ios/c++/HybridNativePlatformSpecSwift.hpp (2)
color
(157-162)color
(157-157)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (2)
47-47
: LGTM: Correct backup pattern for method wrapping.The assignment correctly backs up the original
setRootViewBackgroundColor
method before redefining it, which is a standard pattern for method wrapping.
52-52
: LGTM: Correct call to the backed up native method.The call to
_setRootViewBackgroundColor
with the processed color value is correct. TheprocessColor
function properly converts the color string to a number format expected by the native layer, with0
as a reasonable fallback for invalid or missing colors.
35e55cb
to
451198b
Compare
Summary
Summary by CodeRabbit