Skip to content

fix: root view background color setup #900

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jpudysz
Copy link
Owner

@jpudysz jpudysz commented Jul 8, 2025

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved internal handling of background color assignment for root view, ensuring more consistent color processing. No visible changes to user-facing features.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-native-unistyles-2.0 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 8, 2025 8:39am
react-native-unistyles-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 8, 2025 8:39am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the assignment and implementation of the internal method _setRootViewBackgroundColor within the HybridUnistylesRuntime object. It changes the reference of _setRootViewBackgroundColor to point to the newly defined setRootViewBackgroundColor function and adjusts the internal call to pass a parsed color value without a type assertion.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts Changed _setRootViewBackgroundColor assignment to reference setRootViewBackgroundColor function; updated internal call to _setRootViewBackgroundColor to pass parsed color without type assertion; kept parameter optional.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35e55cb and 451198b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/root-background-color

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (1)

49-53: Consider aligning interface with implementation for type consistency.

The wrapper implementation correctly processes the color string using processColor and provides a sensible fallback value of 0. However, there's a type inconsistency to address:

  • The interface (line 26) declares _setRootViewBackgroundColor(color?: Color): void (optional Color)
  • The implementation always passes a number (never undefined)

Consider updating the interface to reflect the actual usage:

-_setRootViewBackgroundColor(color?: Color): void
+_setRootViewBackgroundColor(color: number): void

This would better represent that the private method always receives a processed numeric color value.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b758392 and 35e55cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (5)
cxx/hybridObjects/HybridUnistylesRuntime.h (2)
  • HybridUnistylesRuntime (16-17)
  • color (68-68)
nitrogen/generated/shared/c++/HybridUnistylesRuntimeSpec.hpp (1)
  • color (84-84)
nitrogen/generated/android/c++/JHybridNativePlatformSpec.hpp (1)
  • color (64-64)
nitrogen/generated/shared/c++/HybridNativePlatformSpec.hpp (1)
  • color (80-80)
nitrogen/generated/ios/c++/HybridNativePlatformSpecSwift.hpp (2)
  • color (157-162)
  • color (157-157)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/specs/UnistylesRuntime/index.ts (2)

47-47: LGTM: Correct backup pattern for method wrapping.

The assignment correctly backs up the original setRootViewBackgroundColor method before redefining it, which is a standard pattern for method wrapping.


52-52: LGTM: Correct call to the backed up native method.

The call to _setRootViewBackgroundColor with the processed color value is correct. The processColor function properly converts the color string to a number format expected by the native layer, with 0 as a reasonable fallback for invalid or missing colors.

@jpudysz jpudysz force-pushed the feature/root-background-color branch from 35e55cb to 451198b Compare July 8, 2025 08:38
@jpudysz jpudysz merged commit a7dcd7b into main Jul 8, 2025
5 checks passed
@jpudysz jpudysz deleted the feature/root-background-color branch July 8, 2025 08:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant