Skip to content

👷 add upstream change detection #31

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ctcpip
Copy link
Member

@ctcpip ctcpip commented Jul 2, 2025

we need to know when node makes changes to these methods

open to better ideas though! 😆

@ctcpip ctcpip requested a review from a team July 2, 2025 21:04
Copy link
Member

@bjohansebas bjohansebas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although it would be good to have it open an issue when the hashes change, since it would be hard for someone to notice just by checking when the workflow fails.

@ctcpip
Copy link
Member Author

ctcpip commented Jul 3, 2025

it would be good to have it open an issue when the hashes change

SGTM if someone else wants to do the work! 😄

@bjohansebas
Copy link
Member

I can do it once this is merged.

const knownWriteHeadHash = '281e0d02084a69893b8c3b8692e3c7c4de2ce22a626217fcf597fa6ddf6955a9'
const knownSetHeaderHash = '2d4f95e92586d28bfd4d3137a8eaacb82b255967d8c26413015c6b56daf0afe7'
const knownAppendHeaderHash = '0deb9f70c3bba63993321cca9281fb4607e2567bed1436b8574c5b86698125a8'
const knownRemoveHeaderHash = '3ad5ccb0a858beb6268f281492bd8d42c9815f5316cc3c4f7f735e142fcd29d9'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we add some automation to update these after a change is looked into? Just to make it easier than copy pasting the new value from the failed build?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, should be a straight-forward follow-on.

Copy link
Member

@jonchurch jonchurch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An affront to g*d, but is informational and we can remove it as soon as we are forced to atone

ctcpip and others added 2 commits July 8, 2025 11:54
@ctcpip ctcpip merged commit 175ab21 into jshttp:master Jul 8, 2025
26 checks passed
@ctcpip ctcpip deleted the upstream-check branch July 8, 2025 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants