Skip to content

Conversation

Arjen-Fuse
Copy link

The min_properties schema parameter currently ends up as maxProperties in the output . This one-line PR corrects the field name.

@CommanderStorm
Copy link

could you add a test case that exercises this code path? This way regressions are less likely

@Arjen-Fuse
Copy link
Author

I've added a test, and confirmed that it fails without the change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants