-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove StorageExtensions #4542
Remove StorageExtensions #4542
Conversation
f60129d
to
3afe0a3
Compare
This pull request has merge conflicts that need to be resolved. |
// NLLB cannot be used with external address | ||
config.Spec.Network.NodeLocalLoadBalancing.Enabled = true | ||
config.Spec.API.ExternalAddress = "k0s.example.com" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, is this really relevant for this PR? If removing openebs results this test being invalid/not-needed, maybe we should just remove the test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test checks the config validation in general, it's not specific to OpenEBS, but used it as an example for an invalid config. So I just picked the first other invalid config combination that came to my mind.
// Deprecated: storage is deprecated and will be ignored starting from k0s | ||
// 1.31 and onwards: https://docs.k0sproject.io/stable/examples/openebs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In 1.30 we already say it's being ignored, now we're saying we'll ignore it 1.31 onwards. bit confusing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We said "and will be ignored in 1.30" (emphasis mine), but that never happened. This PR is now fulfilling that promise.
This pull request has merge conflicts that need to be resolved. |
It's deprecated and marked to be ignored in 1.30. Signed-off-by: Tom Wieczorek <[email protected]>
Description
It's deprecated and marked to be ignored in 1.30.
See:
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist: