Added support for OpenBLAS #240
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
If OpenBLAS is worse then why add it |
@rdentato can you make it work in multi-thread? Does the cblas_sgemv() call start parallel threads to do the work? If not, I'm afraid it's a hard sell... I don't know BLAS, so I can't help on this one. |
|
I think this is worthwile to investigate further if anyone confirms that there are cases where openmp is not available and openBLAS is. |
|
no gain no pain |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
OpenBLAS performs slightly worse than openmp on my machine.
Nevertheless is around a 5x improvement over the plain CPU run.