Refactor retrieval of EDM4hep event Frame into method#238
Merged
jmcarcell merged 4 commits intokey4hep:mainfrom Aug 11, 2025
Merged
Refactor retrieval of EDM4hep event Frame into method#238jmcarcell merged 4 commits intokey4hep:mainfrom
jmcarcell merged 4 commits intokey4hep:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Playing around with godbolt, it indeed looks like the previous version only worked by accident (if it worked at all) (reproducer). I have switched to returning a |
Member
Author
|
Tests are passing for me locally. I have to investigate why they are failing here. |
Member
Author
|
Not sure why tests were passing for me locally, I can't seem to reproduce this. I have added the necessary functionality to put an empty Frame into the TES if none is there already. |
6 tasks
88b0951 to
6d97ad3
Compare
jmcarcell
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BEGINRELEASENOTES
ENDRELEASENOTES
Another standalone outcome of #236
As far as I can tell there is no way that the optional is not engaged that didn't already break before. The behavior before was
@jmcarcell anything I missed here about the previous behavior?